Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 0Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationGeotechnical and construction materials studiesConcrete and Cement Materials Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Alkali-activated Brick Demolition Waste-GGBS Binder for Expansive Soil Stabilization: Strength and Durability Assessment

Kuruva, Manjula, Mudavath, Heeralal, Padavala, Hari Krishna·2026·Indian Geotechnical Journal
DOI 10.1007/s40098-026-01492-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40098-026-01492-8

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Sankara Narayanan M, Rajesh S (2024) A state-of-the-art review on sustainable chemical stabilizers for expansive soils. Indian Geotech J 54:998–1016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-023-00858-6 · DOI
  2. Vikas K, Ramana Murthy V, Ramana GV (2023) Stabilized soil as a sustainable construction material using the rammed Earth technique. Transportation and environmental Geotechnics. (IGC 2021). Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 298. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6774-0_26. · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6774-0_26
  3. Jawad IT, Taha MR (2023) Portland cement treated soil: evaluation and conflict results. Civ Eng Archit 11(2):560–568. https://doi.org/10.13189/cea.2023.110203 · doi:10.13189/cea.2023.110203
  4. Biasi C, Lind SE, Pekkarinen NM, Huttunen JT, Shurpali NJ, Hyvönen NP et al (2008) Direct experimental evidence for the contribution of lime to CO2 release from managed peat soil. Soil Biol Biochem 40(10):2660–2669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.07.011 · DOI
  5. Cho SR, Jeong ST, Kim GY, Lee JG, Kim PJ, Kim GW (2019) Evaluation of the carbon dioxide (CO2) emission factor from lime applied in temperate upland soil. Geoderma 337:742–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.007 · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.007
  6. Gaddam AG, Gondu VR, Yamsani SK, Adigopula VK (2024) Comprehensive utilization of brick waste as a precursor in synthesizing geopolymer for treating black cotton soil. Int J Geotech Eng 18(4):360–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2023.2245230 · DOI
  7. Juarez RIC, Finnegan S (2021) The environmental impact of cement production in Europe: a holistic review of existing EPDs. Cleaner Environmental Systems 3:100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100053 · DOI
  8. Olagunju BD, Olanrewaju O (2021) A Life Cycle Assessment of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) using Damage Oriented (Endpoint) Approach. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98398 · DOI
  9. Turner LK, Collins FG (2013) Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) emissions: a comparison between geopolymer and OPC cement concrete. Constr Build Mater 43:125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wei J, Cen K (2019) Empirical assessing cement CO2 emissions based on China’s economic and social development during 2001–2030. Sci Total Environ 653:200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.371 · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.371
  11. Xiang Q, Pan H, Ma X, Yang M, Lyu Y, Zhang X et al (2024) Impacts of energy-saving and emission-reduction on sustainability of cement production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 191:114089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114089 · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.114089
  12. Andrew RM (2019) Global CO 2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2018. Earth Syst Sci Data 11(4):1675–1710. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.831454 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.831454 · Paper page
  13. Vikas K, Ramana GV (2023) Viability of bulk utilization of granite sludge powder (GSP) to enhance the geotechnical behavior of expansive soil. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.574 · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.04.574
  14. Kola V, Gondu VR, Kuruva M (2025) Potential for sustainable utilization of dolerite rock processing dust to enhance geotechnical characteristics of expansive black cotton soil. Sādhanā 50:8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-024-02654-1 · doi:10.1007/s12046-024-02654-1
  15. IRC 121 (2017) Guidelines for Use of Construction and Demolition Waste in Road Sector. Indian Road Congress (IRC), New Delhi, India. https://doi.org/gov.in.irc.121.2017
  16. Maaze MR, Shrivastava S (2024) Development and performance evaluation of recycled brick waste-based geopolymer brick for improved physcio-mechanical, brick-bond and durability properties. J Build Eng 97:110701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110701 · doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2024.110701
  17. Mahmoodi O, Siad H, Lachemi M, Dadsetan S, Sahmaran M (2020) Optimization of brick waste-based geopolymer binders at ambient temperature and pre-targeted chemical parameters. J Clean Prod 268:122285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122285 · DOI
  18. Günel G, Sevim O (2025) Behavioral analysis of geopolymer mortars incorporating brick and tile powder from construction demolition waste under various cooling regimes following high-temperature exposure. Constr Build Mater 463:140072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140072 · doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.140072
  19. Kandalai S, Patel A (2025) Alkali activation of red mud and GGBS blends for expansive soil stabilization: strength, durability and leachate studies. Indian Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-025-01183-w · DOI · Paper page
  20. Pratap B, Rao BH, Mondal S, Uniyal K (2025) Treatment methods and influence of red mud and phosphogypsum on pavement composite performance: a state-of-the-art review. Indian Geotech J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-025-01460-8 · doi:10.1007/s40098-025-01460-8
  21. Kandalai S, Patel A (2025) Geomechanical and microstructural behaviour of expansive soil stabilized with red mud and GGBS: an experimental investigation. Arab J Sci Eng 50(11):7965–7985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09171-7 · DOI
  22. Hwang CL, Yehualaw MD, Vo DH, Huynh TP, Largo A (2019) Performance evaluation of alkali activated mortar containing high volume of waste brick powder blended with ground granulated blast furnace slag cured at ambient temperature. Constr Build Mater 223:657–667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.062 · DOI
  23. Rakhimova NR, Rakhimov RZ (2015) Alkali-activated cements and mortars based on blast furnace slag and red clay brick waste. Mater Des 85:324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.182 · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.182
  24. Reig L, Tashima MM, Borrachero MV, Monzo J, Cheeseman CR, Paya J (2013) Properties and microstructure of alkali-activated red clay brick waste. Constr Build Mater 43:98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.031 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Abdila SR, Abdullah MMAB, Ahmad R, Rahim SZA, Rychta M, Wnuk I et al (2021) Evaluation on the mechanical properties of ground granulated blast slag (GGBS) and fly Ash stabilized soil via geopolymer process. Materials 14(11):2833. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14112833 · DOI · Paper page
  26. De Rossi A, Ribeiro MJ, Labrincha JA, Novais RM, Hotza D, Moreira RFPM (2019) Effect of the particle size range of construction and demolition waste on the fresh and hardened-state properties of fly ash-based geopolymer mortars with total replacement of sand. Process Saf Environ Prot 129:130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.026 · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2019.06.026
  27. Sharma PK, Singh JP, Kumar A (2019) Effect of particle size on physical and mechanical properties of fly ash based geopolymers. Trans Indian Inst Met 72(5):1323–1337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12666-019-01628-w · doi:10.1007/s12666-019-01628-w
  28. Tan J, Cizer Ö, De Vlieger J, Dan H, Li J (2022) Impacts of milling duration on construction and demolition waste (CDW) based precursor and resulting geopolymer: reactivity, geopolymerization and sustainability. Resour Conserv Recycl 184:106433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106433 · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106433
  29. Isik A (2025) Experimental study on compressive strength of clay soil stabilized with construction and demolition waste-based geopolymer. Bull Eng Geol Environ 84(7):380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-025-04396-8 · DOI
  30. Sahoo S, Singh SP (2022) Strength and durability properties of expansive soil treated with geopolymer and conventional stabilizers. Constr Build Mater 328:127078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127078 · DOI

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Kuruva, M., Mudavath, H., & Padavala, H. K.
ORCID
Venue
Indian Geotechnical Journal
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2026-02-16
Volume
56
Issue
7
Pages
3634-3648
ISSN
  • 0046-8983 (ISSN-L)
  • 0971-9555
  • 2277-3347
DOI
10.1007/s40098-026-01492-8
OpenAlex
W7129096549
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Indian geotechnical journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
ground granulated blast furnace slag, alkali-activated binders, Vertisols, geopolymer, sodium silicate, sodium hydroxide, unconfined compressive strength, swell index, durability, wetting-drying cycles, construction and demolition waste, concrete mix design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alkali-activated Brick Demolition Waste-GGBS Binder for Expansive Soil Stabilization: Strength and Durability Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40098-026-01492-8
The paper
Kuruva, M., Mudavath, H., & Padavala, H. K. (2026). Alkali-activated Brick Demolition Waste-GGBS Binder for Expansive Soil Stabilization: Strength and Durability Assessment. Indian Geotechnical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-026-01492-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.