Cited by 94ECG Monitoring and AnalysisNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

The Use of Wearable ECG Devices in the Clinical Setting: A Review

Open access
Kamga, Paola, Mostafa, Rasik, Zafar, Saba·2022·Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review This review investigates the use of wearable electrocardiograms (ECGs) in the clinic and acute care setting, and their impact on patient care, particularly pertaining to the management of cardiac arrhythmias.Recent findings Wearable ECGs have consistently demonstrated their non-inferiority in detecting arrhythmias when compared to the current standard of care. Different studies have highlighted their ability to improve patient care and reduce healthcare costs, while more devices are being created to work as a screening tool at a larger scale or to fit the physical abilities of a variety of patients.Summary The use of wearable cardiac monitoring devices demonstrated considerable symptom-rhythm correlation in various clinical settings, which often resulted in a reduction in time to diagnosis and lower rates of ED visits. However, this relatively new technology raised concerns for patient accessibility and privacy among others. Further research is needed to assess their sensitivity and specificity in the clinical setting, as well as their limitations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40138-022-00248-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 94

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Antman EM Anbe DT Armstrong PW ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) Circulation 2004 110 9 e82 292 15339869

Authors
Kamga, P., Mostafa, R., & Zafar, S.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Kamga, Paola
Venue
Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports
Published
2022-06-25
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
67-72
ISSN
2167-4884 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283517751
Cited by
94
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 3
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Emergency and Hospital Medicine Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
wearable ECG, arrhythmia detection, cardiac monitoring, arrhythmia screening, emergency department visits, health care costs, patient privacy, non-inferiority

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review