CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 33Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity ResearchBiomedical and Chemical Research

Current status of EEG-based depth-of-consciousness monitoring during general anesthesia

Open access
Musialowicz, Tadeusz, Lahtinen, Pasi·2014·Current Anesthesiology Reports
DOI 10.1007/s40140-014-0061-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40140-014-0061-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EEG/MEG signals, generated by synchronous neuronal firing, are the most accessible measure of the brain's EM field and strongly correlate with conscious states, as evidenced by clinical use in brain-damaged patients and general anesthesia.

    “The strong correlation between EEG signals and conscious states is evidenced by the widespread clinical use of EEG to assess the level of consciousness and awareness in brain-damaged patients (Engemann et al., 2018) and in general anesthesia (Musialowicz and Lahtinen, 2014).”

    From Consciousness: Matter or EMF? (2023) · cites this paper as Musialowicz and Lahtinen, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Consciousness: Matter or EMF?

    McFadden, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.1024934 · Cited by 27 · see citing works

    “The strong correlation between EEG signals and conscious states is evidenced by the widespread clinical use of EEG to assess the level of consciousness and awareness in brain-damaged patients (Engemann et al., 2018) and in general anesthesia (Musialowicz and Lahtinen, 2014).”
    Background

Authors
Musialowicz, T., & Lahtinen, P.
Affiliations
Kuopio University Hospital (FI)
Corresponding author
Musialowicz, Tadeusz
ORCID
Venue
Current Anesthesiology Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
251-260
ISSN
  • 1523-3855 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-6275
DOI
10.1007/s40140-014-0061-x
OpenAlex
W1996151061
Cited by
33
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Current anesthesiology reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
Keywords
depth of anesthesia monitoring, general anesthesia, intraoperative awareness, emergence of consciousness, anesthetic mechanisms, anesthesia adverse events, postoperative recovery, clinical trial limitations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review