Cited by 5Gastrointestinal motility and disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Diet consistency modification improves postprandial glycemic and gastroparesis symptoms

Open access
Betônico, Carolina C., Cobello, Aline Vial, Santos-Bezerra, Daniele P., de A. Leite, André Z., Correa-Giannella, Maria Lúcia, Nery, Márcia, Queiroz, Márcia S.·2022·Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders

Abstract

Diabetic gastroparesis (DGP) is an autonomic neuropathy resulting from long-standing poorly controlled diabetes, and it is also linked to fluctuations in glycemic control due to variability on nutrient absorption. Objectives Considering the scarcity of information, the aim of this study was to identify the impact of modifications on diet consistency on post-prandial glucose variability using a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and its effect on the perception and severity of gastrointestinal symptoms. Methods This proof-of-concept study was carried out in a cross-sectional cohort of six individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus with confirmed diagnosis of DGP. Two types of diet were used to evaluate glycemic control and DGP symptoms, general consistency standard meal (SD) and modified consistency test diet (MD), associated with an application of rapid acting insulin at the time of food intake. Glycemic control was evaluated by CGM, and the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) was applied after meals. Results The CGM curve was different for MD + insulin and SD + insulin. There was a smaller increment of interstitial glucose with 2 h after MD + insulin, returning almost to the basal level 4 h later. Patients scored significantly lower GCSI after MD + insulin compared to the same index after they received SD + insulin. Moreover, there was a decrease in important clinical scores present in the index, like: "Not able to finish meal", "Loss of appetite" and "Stomach or bel…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40200-022-01117-w

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Betônico, C. C., Cobello, A. V., Santos-Bezerra, D. P., de A. Leite, A. Z., Correa-Giannella, M. L., Nery, M., & Queiroz, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Universidade Nove de Julho (BR)
Corresponding author
Queiroz, Márcia S.
Venue
Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders
Published
2022-09-19
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
1661-1667
ISSN
2251-6581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296252585
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetic gastroparesis, type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, rapid-acting insulin, Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index, gastrointestinal symptoms, autonomic neuropathy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review