Cited by 265Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obesity and anxiety symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Amiri, Sohrab, Behnezhad, Sepideh·2019·neuropsychiatrie

Abstract

Background Obesity and anxiety are the two most common health problems and increased body mass index can be lead to anxiety. Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the frequency of anxiety symptoms in people who are obese/overweight. Methods For this purpose the authors systematically searched keywords in the databases PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO and Google scholar through August 2018. After a comprehensive review, 25 studies were included into the meta-analysis. Results Results of the meta-analysis showed that the frequency of anxiety in obesity had a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.30 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.20-1.41 and in overweight had an OR of 1.10 and CI of 1.00-1.21. Comparison between obesity/overweight and normal weight showed high frequency of anxiety in obesity/overweight with respect to subgroups (sex, obesity and anxiety assessment, adjusted/unadjusted, anxiety duration and age). Evaluation of 25 studies included in the meta-analysis showed publication bias. Conclusion Overall, findings indicate anxiety occurs more frequently in obese/overweight people compared with normal weight people.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40211-019-0302-9

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Anxiety Disorders Association of America. (2012). Facts & statistics. Retrieved from http://www.adaa.org/about-adaa/press-room/facts-statistics . Published 2010. Accessed January 3, 2012
  2. Kessler RC, Greenberg PE. The economic burden of anxiety and stress disorders. InNeuropsychopharmacology: TheFifthGeneration of Progress. In: Davis KL, Charney D, Coyle JT, Nemeroff C, editors. Lippencott. Philadelphia: Williams and Wilkins; 2002.
  3. Murray CJL, Lopez A. Global Health Statistics: A Compendium of Incidence, Prevalence and Mortality Estimates for. over, Vol. 200. Cambridge MA.: Conditions. Harvard School of Public Health on behalf of the World Health Organization and the World Bank; 1996.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 265

Metadata

Authors
Amiri, S., & Behnezhad, S.
Affiliations
  • Urmia University (IR)
  • Kharazmi University (IR)
Corresponding author
Amiri, Sohrab
Venue
neuropsychiatrie
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
33
Issue
2
Pages
72-89
ISSN
  • 0948-6259 (ISSN-L)
  • 2194-1327
OpenAlex
W2915811569
Cited by
265
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuropsychiatrie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
None (None)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity, anxiety symptoms, overweight, body mass index, anxiety prevalence, sex differences, anxiety assessment, publication bias
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Humans, Obesity, Comorbidity, Body Mass Index, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review