Efficacy of Pemafibrate Versus Fenofibrate Administration on Serum Lipid Levels in Patients with Dyslipidemia: Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review
Abstract
Background Pemafibrate is a novel fibrate class drug that is a highly potent and selective agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα). We performed the first ever network meta-analysis containing the largest ever group of patients to test the efficacy of pemafibrate in improving lipid levels compared with fenofibrate and placebo in patients with dyslipidemia. Methods Potentially relevant clinical trials were identified in Medline, PubMed, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and Cochrane Controlled Trials registry. Nine randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria out of 40 potentially available articles. The primary effect outcome was a change in the levels of triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoproteins (HDL), or low-density lipoproteins (LDL) before and after the treatment. Results A total of 12,359 subjects were included. The mean patient age was 54.73 (years), the mean ratio for female patients was 18.75%, and the mean examination period was 14.22 weeks. The dose for pemafibrate included in our study was 0.1, 0.2, or 0.4 mg twice daily, whereas the dose for fenofibrate was 100 mg/day. Data showed a significant reduction in TG and a mild increase in HDL levels across the pemafibrate group at different doses and fenofibrate 100 mg group (with greatest effect observed with pemafibrate 0.1 mg twice daily). A mild increase in LDL was also observed in all groups, but the increase in LDL in the 0.1 mg twice daily dose group was statistically insignifican…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical trials have demonstrated significant triglyceride-lowering effects of pemafibrate across different dosing regimens.
“Clinical trials have evaluated pemafibrate in diverse patient populations with dyslipidemia, demonstrating significant TG-lowering effects across different dosing regimens [5–7].”
From Pemafibrate for hypertriglyceridemia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating efficacy and safety outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 11
- Authors
- Khan, M. S., Ghumman, G. M., Baqi, A., Shah, J., Aziz, M., Mir, T., Tahir, A., Katragadda, S., Singh, H., Taleb, M., & Ali, S. S.
- Affiliations
- Mercy St. Vincent Medical Center (US)
- University of Toledo (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ghumman, Ghulam Mujtaba
- ORCID
- Venue
- American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs
- Published
- 2023-07-31
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 547-558
- ISSN
- 1175-3277 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-187X
- OpenAlex
- W4385410022
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Keywords
- pemafibrate, fenofibrate, dyslipidemia, serum lipids, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, PPARα agonist, fibrate drugs, dose comparison, hypertriglyceridemia
- MeSH terms
- Network Meta-Analysis, Hypolipidemic Agents, Benzoxazoles, Butyrates, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Triglycerides, Dyslipidemias
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review