Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin: A Guide to Its Use in Various Malignancies

Lyseng-Williamson, Katherine A., Duggan, Sean T., Keating, Gillian M.·2013·BioDrugs

Abstract

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx(®) [EU], Doxil(®) [USA]) represents an improved formulation of conventional doxorubicin, with reduced cardiotoxicity and an improved pharmacokinetic profile. As shown by evidence from clinical trials, intravenous pegylated liposomal doxorubicin is a useful option in the treatment of various malignancies, including metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer, multiple myeloma, and AIDS-related Kaposi sarcoma. It has a favourable safety profile relative to conventional doxorubicin and other available chemotherapy agents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40259-013-0070-1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Duggan ST, Keating GM. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin: a review of its use in metastatic breast cancer, ovarian cancer, multiple myeloma and AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. Drugs. 2011;71(18):2531–58. · DOI · Paper page
  2. O’Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, et al. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (Caelyx/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004;15(3):440–9. · DOI
  3. Jäger E, Al-Batran S, Saupe S, et al. A randomized phase III study evaluating pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus capecitabine (CAP) as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC): results of the PELICAN study [abstract no. 1022]. J Clin Oncol. 2010;15 Suppl. · DOI
  4. Keller AM, Mennel RG, Georgoulias VA, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus vinorelbine or mitomycin C plus vinblastine in women with taxane-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(19):3893–901. · DOI
  5. Alba E, Ruiz-Borrego M, Margeli M, et al. Maintenance treatment with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus observation following induction chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: GEICAM 2001–01 study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122(1):169–76. · DOI
  6. Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Lorusso D, et al. Phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(6):890–6. · DOI
  7. Mutch DG, Orlando M, Goss T, et al. Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(19):2811–8. · DOI
  8. Gordon AN, Fleagle JT, Guthrie D, et al. Recurrent epithelial ovarian carcinoma: a randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(14):3312–22. · DOI
  9. Pujade-Lauraine E, Wagner U, Aavall-Lundqvist E, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and carboplatin compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin for patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer in late relapse. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3323–9. · DOI
  10. Monk BJ, Herzog TJ, Kaye SB, et al. Trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) versus PLD in recurrent ovarian cancer: overall survival analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(15):2361–8. · DOI
  11. Orlowski RZ, Nagler A, Sonneveld P, et al. Randomized phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus bortezomib compared with bortezomib alone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: combination therapy improves time to progression. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(25):3892–901. · DOI
  12. Martin-Carbonero L, Barrios A, Saballs P, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin plus highly active antiretroviral therapy versus highly active antiretroviral therapy alone in HIV patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma. AIDS. 2004;18(12):1737–40. · DOI
  13. Cianfrocca M, Lee S, Von Roenn J, et al. Randomized trial of paclitaxel versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for advanced human immunodeficiency virus-associated Kaposi sarcoma: evidence of symptom palliation from chemotherapy. Cancer. 2010;116(16):3969–77. · DOI
  14. Kesterson JP, Odunsi K, Lele S. High cumulative doses of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin are not associated with cardiac toxicity in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Chemotherapy. 2010;56(2):108–11. · DOI
  15. Yildirim Y, Gultekin E, Avci ME, et al. Cardiac safety profile of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin reaching or exceeding lifetime cumulative doses of 550 mg/m2 in patients with recurrent ovarian and peritoneal cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008;18(2):223–7. · DOI
  16. Rayson D, Suter TM, Jackisch C, et al. Cardiac safety of adjuvant pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with concurrent trastuzumab: a randomized phase II trial. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(7):1780–8. · DOI
  17. Fiegl M, Mlineritsch B, Hubalek M, et al. Single-agent pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: results of an Austrian observational trial. BMC Cancer. 2011;11:373. · DOI
  18. Sehouli J, Camara O, Schmidt M, et al. Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CAELYX) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer: results of a German multicenter observational study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009;64(3):585–91. · DOI
  19. Sehouli J, Oskay-Ozcelik G, Kühne J, et al. Biweekly pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer: results of a multicenter phase-II trial. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(6):957–61. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 36

Metadata

Authors
Lyseng-Williamson, K. A., Duggan, S. T., & Keating, G. M.
Venue
BioDrugs
Published
2013-09-10
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
533-540
ISSN
  • 1173-8804
  • 1179-190X
Cited by
36
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review