Cited by 182Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

A pooled analysis of clinical pharmacology trials investigating the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of fast-acting insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes

Open access
Heise, Tim, Pieber, Thomas R., Danne, Thomas, Erichsen, Lars, Haahr, Hanne·2017·Clinical Pharmacokinetics

Abstract

Fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) is insulin aspart (IAsp) in a new formulation aiming to mimic the fast endogenous prandial insulin release more closely than currently available insulin products. In a post hoc analysis of pooled data from six clinical pharmacology trials, the pharmacological characteristics of faster aspart and IAsp were compared. The analysis included 218 adult subjects with type 1 diabetes from six randomised, double-blind, crossover trials in the faster aspart clinical development programme. Subjects received subcutaneous dosing (0.2 U/kg) of faster aspart and IAsp. In three trials, a 12-h euglycaemic clamp was performed (target 5.5 mmol/L; 100 mg/dL) to assess pharmacodynamics. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles were left-shifted for faster aspart versus IAsp. Onset of appearance occurred 4.9 min earlier (95% confidence interval [CI] faster aspart-IAsp: [−5.3 to −4.4], p < 0.001), early exposure (AUCIAsp,0–30min) was two times greater (estimated ratio faster aspart/IAsp 2.01 [1.87–2.17], p < 0.001) and offset of exposure (t Late 50% Cmax) occurred 12.2 min earlier [−17.9 to −6.5] (p < 0.001) for faster aspart versus IAsp. Accordingly, onset of action occurred 4.9 min earlier [−6.9 to −3.0] (p < 0.001), early glucose-lowering effect (AUCGIR,0–30min) was 74% greater (1.74 [1.47–2.10], p < 0.001) and offset of glucose-lowering effect (t Late 50% GIRmax) occurred 14.3 min earlier [−22.1 to −6.5] (p < 0.001) for faster aspart versus IAsp. Total exposure and total glucose-lowering effect did not differ significantly between treatments. Faster aspart has the potential to better mimic the physiologic prandial insulin secretion and thereby to improve postprandial glucose control compared with IAsp. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02035371, NCT01924637, NCT02131246, NCT02033239, NCT02003677, NCT01618188.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40262-017-0514-8

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two injectable ultra-rapid-acting analog (URAA) insulin formulations are available that contain excipients that accelerate absorption and provide more activity in the first portion of their profile compared with the other RAA.

    “Two injectable ultra-rapid-acting analog (URAA) insulin formulations are available that contain excipients that accelerate absorption and provide more activity in the first portion of their profile compared with the other RAA (8,9).”

    From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction describes one injectable formulation, faster aspart, and says its added niacinamide accelerates initial absorption. The Results report greater early glucose-lowering activity than insulin aspart in adults with type 1 diabetes. This paper does not establish that two such formulations are available or compare faster aspart with other rapid-acting analogs beyond insulin aspart. Page numbers were not supplied for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Faster-acting insulin aspart has a quicker onset and offset than regular insulin aspart and offers better control of postmeal glucose spikes and less hypoglycaemia 2-5 h after a meal.

    “Fasteracting insulin aspart has a quicker onset and offset than regular insulin aspart and offers better control of postmeal glucose spikes and less hypoglycaemia 2-5 h after a meal.80”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [80]

    The Conclusions report faster onset and earlier offset than insulin aspart, and the Discussion reports better postprandial glucose control in meal tests. The Discussion says earlier offset may reduce late postprandial hypoglycaemia, but it does not establish less hypoglycaemia 2–5 hours after a meal. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This finding aligns with those of previous clinical trials that showed faster-acting insulins improve postprandial glucose without compromising overall glycaemic management or safety.

    “This finding aligns with those of previous clinical trials that showed fasteracting insulins improve postprandial glucose without compromising overall glycaemic management or safety.80,81”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [80]

  • Results from comparative effectiveness meta-analyses suggest that each new class of oral noninsulin agents when added to metformin generally lowers A1C by approximately 0.7-1.0% (8-11 mmol/mol).

    “Results from comparative effectiveness meta-analyses suggest that each new class of oral noninsulin agents when added to metformin generally lowers A1C by approximately 0.7-1.0%(8-11 mmol/mol).”

    From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Results section compares the glucose-lowering effects of two insulin aspart formulations in adults with type 1 diabetes. Searches for oral noninsulin agents added to metformin, comparative-effectiveness meta-analyses, and the stated A1C reduction found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [1]The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus N Engl J Med 1993 329 977 986 10.1056/NEJM199309303291401 8366922 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Woerle HJ Neumann C Zschau S Impact of fasting and postprandial glycemia on overall glycemic control in type 2 diabetes Importance of postprandial glycemia to achieve target HbA1c levels Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007 77 280 285 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.11.011 17240473 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [6]Heise T Getting closer to physiologic insulin secretion Clin Ther 2007 29 S161 S165 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.012 18191068 · DOI
  4. [7]Heinemann L Muchmore DB Ultrafast-acting insulins: state of the art J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012 6 728 742 10.1177/193229681200600402 22920797 PMC3440142 · DOI
  5. [9]Hermansen K Bohl M Schioldan AG Insulin aspart in the management of diabetes mellitus: 15 years of clinical experience Drugs. 2016 76 41 74 10.1007/s40265-015-0500-0 26607485 PMC4700065 · DOI
  6. [12]Fath M Danne T Biester T Faster-acting insulin aspart provides faster onset and greater early exposure vs insulin aspart in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus Pediatr Diabetes. 2017 28165180
  7. [13]Heise T Stender-Petersen K Hövelmann U Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of faster-acting insulin aspart versus insulin aspart across a clinically relevant dose range in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus Clinical Pharmacokinet. 2016 PMC5425492 27878566
  8. [14]Heise T Hövelmann U Zijlstra E A comparison of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties between faster-acting insulin aspart and insulin aspart in elderly subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus Drugs Aging 2017 34 1 29 38 10.1007/s40266-016-0418-6 27873152 PMC5222895 · DOI
  9. [15]Heise T Hövelmann U Brøndsted L Faster-acting insulin aspart: earlier onset of appearance and greater early pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects than insulin aspart Diabetes Obes Metab 2015 17 682 688 10.1111/dom.12468 25846340 PMC5054830 · DOI
  10. [19]Cobry E McFann K Messer L Timing of meal insulin boluses to achieve optimal postprandial glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 12 173 177 10.1089/dia.2009.0112 20151766 · DOI
  11. [20]Luijf YM van Bon AC Hoekstra JB Devries JH Premeal injection of rapid-acting insulin reduces postprandial glycemic excursions in type 1 diabetes Diabetes Care 2010 33 2152 2155 10.2337/dc10-0692 20693354 PMC2945151 · DOI
  12. [21]Howey DC Bowsher RR Brunelle RL [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)]-human insulin: effect of injection time on postprandial glycemia Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995 58 459 469 10.1016/0009-9236(95)90060-8 7586939 · DOI
  13. [22]Overmann H Heinemann L Injection-meal interval: recommendations of diabetologists and how patients handle it Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1999 43 137 142 10.1016/S0168-8227(98)00132-6 10221666 · DOI
  14. [26]Jain L Parks MH Sahajwalla C Determination of time to onset and rate of action of insulin products: importance and new approaches J Pharm Sci 2013 102 271 279 10.1002/jps.23355 23132625 · DOI
  15. [27]Heise T Nosek L Spitzer H Insulin glulisine: a faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro Diabetes Obes Metab 2007 9 746 753 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00746.x 17593235 · DOI
  16. [28]Swinnen SG Holleman F DeVries JH The interpretation of glucose clamp studies of long-acting insulin analogues: from physiology to marketing and back Diabetologia 2008 51 1790 1795 10.1007/s00125-008-1098-5 18670752 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heise, T., Pieber, T. R., Danne, T., Erichsen, L., & Haahr, H.
Affiliations
  • Profil Institute for Metabolic Research (DE)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult (DE)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Heise, Tim
Venue
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
Published
2017-02-15
Volume
56
Issue
5
Pages
551-559
ISSN
  • 0312-5963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-1926
OpenAlex
W2587826249
Cited by
182
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 1
FWCI
19.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
fast-acting insulin aspart, insulin aspart, type 1 diabetes, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, euglycaemic clamp, glucose-lowering effect, subcutaneous insulin, insulin formulations, glycemic control, postprandial blood glucose, insulin sensitivity, insulin clearance
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Male, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Cross-Over Studies, Insulin Aspart

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review