Adherence and Persistence Across Antidepressant Therapeutic Classes: A Retrospective Claims Analysis Among Insured US Patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Adherence and persistence to therapy, or how well a patient follows provider directions on frequency and time to discontinuation of prescribed medications, is associated with positive health outcomes, including decreased healthcare costs and patient mortality. A clear literature gap exists assessing adherence and persistence to antidepressants (ADs) in the major depressive disorder (MDD) population at clinically relevant time points and at the therapeutic class level. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed adherence and persistence to specific ADs, therapeutic classes, and AD therapy overall at multiple time points among US individuals from commercial, Medicare supplemental, and Medicaid insurance plans. METHODS: databases. These databases contain information on diagnoses, billing codes, and dates of service. Adherence (proportion of days covered) and persistence (days until a 30-day gap in therapy) were calculated to AD medication, AD therapeutic class, and AD therapy overall over the first 3, 6, 9, and 12 months from the index prescription date. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) of adherence to initial AD medication comparing AD therapeutic classes. RESULTS: For 527,907 patients, adherence to initial AD medication decreased over 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (41, 31, 24, and 21%, respectively). Similar patterns were observed for adherence to initial AD therapeutic class, AD therapy overall, and all three persistence calculations. The odds of adherence to SNRIs versus SSRIs were 20-27% greater at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months (ORs 1.20, 1.23, 1.25, 1.27, respectively; p-values all <0.0001). Similar or significantly lower odds of adherence were demonstrated for other classes versus SSRIs at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months [ORs for other ADs 0.80, 0.77, 0.74, 0.72, respectively (p-values all <0.0001); ORs for TCAs 0.46, 0.45, 0.47, 0.49, respectively (p-values all <0.0001); ORs for MAOIs 1.13, 1.0, 0.77, 0.69, respectively (p-values all >0.05)]. CONCLUSION: We found low adherence and persistence to ADs in the MDD population. Within the limitations of the insurance claims data we analysed, our results suggest that adherence may differ based on therapeutic class, as patients initiating SNRI therapy appeared to have a higher likelihood of adherence versus SSRIs over the year assessed, while the odds of adherence appeared similar or lower for other classes versus SSRIs. Further prospective research is needed to confirm these findings and determine additional drivers of these apparent differences by AD therapeutic class.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The use of digital technologies for depression, including telehealth and telemedicine, also increased during the pandemic; patients with depression were three times more likely to use telehealth than those without.
“The use of digital technologies for depression, including telehealth and telemedicine, also increased during the pandemic; patients with depression were three times more likely to use telehealth than those without.68,69”
From Digital health technologies and major depressive disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36 · Cited by 99
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [3]Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2013 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. 2014. http://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHmhfr2013/NSDUHmhfr2013.pdf. Accessed 7 July 2016. 27656739
- Authors
- Keyloun, K. R., Hansen, R. N., Hepp, Z., Gillard, P., Thase, M. E., & Devine, E. B.
- Affiliations
- Allergan (United States) (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keyloun, Katelyn R.
- Venue
- CNS Drugs
- Published
- 2017-04-04
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 421-432
- ISSN
- 1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-1934
- PMC
- PMC5425490
- OpenAlex
- W2604452424
- Cited by
- 99
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 8.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2017-04-27)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- CNS Drugs (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Washington
- Allergan
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- antidepressant adherence, major depressive disorder, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, TCAS, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, trazodone
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Insurance, Health, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, United States, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Medication Adherence, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review