MADEx: A System for Detecting Medications, Adverse Drug Events, and Their Relations from Clinical Notes
Open accessAbstract
Introduction Early detection of adverse drug events (ADEs) from electronic health records is an important, challenging task to support pharmacovigilance and drug safety surveillance. A well-known challenge to use clinical text for detection of ADEs is that much of the detailed information is documented in a narrative manner. Clinical natural language processing (NLP) is the key technology to extract information from unstructured clinical text. Objective We present a machine learning-based clinical NLP system-MADEx-for detecting medications, ADEs, and their relations from clinical notes. Methods We developed a recurrent neural network (RNN) model using a long short-term memory (LSTM) strategy for clinical name entity recognition (NER) and compared it with baseline conditional random fields (CRFs). We also developed a modified training strategy for the RNN, which outperformed the widely used early stop strategy. For relation extraction, we compared support vector machines (SVMs) and random forests on single-sentence relations and cross-sentence relations. In addition, we developed an integrated pipeline to extract entities and relations together by combining RNNs and SVMs. Results MADEx achieved the top-three best performances (F1 score of 0.8233) for clinical NER in the 2018 Medication and Adverse Drug Events (MADE1.0) challenge. The post-challenge evaluation showed that the relation extraction module and integrated pipeline (identify entity and relation together) of MADEx are comparable with the best systems developed in this challenge. Conclusion This study demonstrated the efficiency of deep learning methods for automatic extraction of medications, ADEs, and their relations from clinical text to support pharmacovigilance and drug safety surveillance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies developed individual classifiers to handle relations with different cross-distance.
“Previous studies [44,45] developed individual classifiers to handle relations with different cross-distance”
From Extracting Family History of Patients From Clinical Narratives: Exploring an End-to-End Solution With Deep Learning Models (2020) · cites this paper as [44]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Savova, G. K., Kipper-Schuler, K. C., Hurdle, J. F., & Meystre, S. M. (2008) · Yearbook of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1638592 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- [1]Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2000) To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press (US), Washington (DC) 25077248
- [3]Stausberg J (2014) International prevalence of adverse drug events in hospitals: an analysis of routine data from England, Germany, and the USA. BMC Health Serv Res 14: 125 24620750 PMC3984698
- [4]Poudel DR, Acharya P, Ghimire S, Dhital R, Bharati R (2017) Burden of hospitalizations related to adverse drug events in the USA: a retrospective analysis from large inpatient database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 26: 635– 641 28233421
- [5]Aljadhey H, Mahmoud MA, Mayet A, Alshaikh M, Ahmed Y, Murray MD, Bates DW (2013) Incidence of adverse drug events in an academic hospital: a prospective cohort study. Int J Qual Health Care J Int Soc Qual Health Care 25: 648– 655 24141014
- [6]Aljadhey H, Mahmoud MA, Ahmed Y, (2016) Incidence of adverse drug events in public and private hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: the (ADESA) prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 6: e010831 PMC4947792 27406640
- [7]Wang Y, Wang L, Rastegar-Mojarad M, (2018) Clinical information extraction applications: A literature review. J Biomed Inform 77: 34– 49 29162496 PMC5771858
- [9]Nadkarni PM, Ohno-Machado L, Chapman WW (2011) Natural language processing: an introduction. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 18: 544– 551 21846786 PMC3168328
- [11]Uzuner Ö, South BR, Shen S, DuVall SL (2011) 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 18: 552– 556 21685143 PMC3168320
- [12]Sun W, Rumshisky A, Uzuner O (2013) Evaluating temporal relations in clinical text: 2012 i2b2 Challenge. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 20: 806– 813 23564629 PMC3756273
- [14]Pradhan S, Elhadad N, South BR, Martinez D, Christensen L, Vogel A, Suominen H, Chapman WW, Savova G (2015) Evaluating the state of the art in disorder recognition and normalization of the clinical narrative. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 22: 143– 154 25147248 PMC4433360
- [15]Lafferty JD, McCallum A, Pereira FCN (2001) Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data In: Proc. Eighteenth Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp 282– 289
- [16]Hearst MA, Dumais ST, Osuna E, Platt J, Scholkopf B (1998) Support vector machines. IEEE Intell Syst Their Appl 13: 18– 28
- [18]Aronson AR, Lang F-M (2010) An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 17: 229– 236 20442139 PMC2995713
- [19]Friedman C (1997) Towards a comprehensive medical language processing system: methods and issues. Proc Conf Am Med Inform Assoc AMIA Fall Symp 595– 599 PMC2233560 9357695
- [20]Denny JC, Irani PR, Wehbe FH, Smithers JD, Spickard A (2003) The KnowledgeMap project: development of a concept-based medical school curriculum database. AMIA Annu Symp Proc AMIA Symp 195– 199 14728161 PMC1480333
- [21]de Bruijn B, Cherry C, Kiritchenko S, Martin J, Zhu X (2011) Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 18: 557– 562 21565856 PMC3168309
- [24]Le H-Q, Nguyen TM, Vu ST, Dang TH (2018) D3NER: Biomedical named entity recognition using CRF-biLSTM improved with fine-tuned embeddings of various linguistic information. Bioinforma Oxf Engl. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty356 29718118 · DOI
- [25]Habibi M, Weber L, Neves M, Wiegandt DL, Leser U (2017) Deep learning with word embeddings improves biomedical named entity recognition. Bioinforma Oxf Engl 33: i37– i48 PMC5870729 28881963
- [26]Liu Z, Yang M, Wang X, Chen Q, Tang B, Wang Z, Xu H (2017) Entity recognition from clinical texts via recurrent neural network. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0468-7 PMC5506598 28699566 · DOI
- [27]Jagannatha AN, Yu H (2016) Bidirectional RNN for Medical Event Detection in Electronic Health Records. Proc Conf Assoc Comput Linguist North Am Chapter Meet 2016: 473– 482 PMC5119627 27885364
- [28]Wu Y, Jiang M, Lei J, Xu H (2015) Named Entity Recognition in Chinese Clinical Text Using Deep Neural Network. Stud Health Technol Inform 216: 624– 628 26262126 PMC4624324
- [29]Wu Y, Jiang M, Xu J, Zhi D, Xu H (2017) Clinical Named Entity Recognition Using Deep Learning Models. AMIA Annu Symp Proc PMC5977567 29854252
- [30]Zhao S, Grishman R (2005) Extracting Relations with Integrated Information Using Kernel Methods In: Proc. 43rd Annu. Meet. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, pp 419– 426
- [31]Tikk D, Thomas P, Palaga P, Hakenberg J, Leser U (2010) A comprehensive benchmark of kernel methods to extract protein-protein interactions from literature. PLoS Comput Biol 6: e1000837 20617200 PMC2895635
- [33]Brin S (1999) Extracting Patterns and Relations from the World Wide Web In: Sel. Pap. Int. Workshop World Wide Web Databases. Springer-Verlag, London, UK, UK, pp 172– 183
- [34]Tang B, Wu Y, Jiang M, Chen Y, Denny JC, Xu H (2013) A hybrid system for temporal information extraction from clinical text. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA 20: 828– 835 23571849 PMC3756274
- [35]Xu J, Wu Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Lee H-J, Xu H (2016) CD-REST: a system for extracting chemical-induced disease relation in literature. Database. doi: 10.1093/database/baw036 PMC4808251 27016700 · DOI
- [36]Wei C-H, Peng Y, Leaman R, Davis AP, Mattingly CJ, Li J, Wiegers TC, Lu Z (2016) Assessing the state of the art in biomedical relation extraction: overview of the BioCreative V chemical-disease relation (CDR) task. Database J Biol Databases Curation. doi: 10.1093/database/baw032 PMC4799720 26994911 · DOI · Paper page
- [37]Comeau DC, Islamaj Doğan R, Ciccarese P, (2013) BioC: a minimalist approach to interoperability for biomedical text processing. Database J Biol Databases Curation. doi: 10.1093/database/bat064 PMC3889917 24048470 · DOI
- [38]Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9: 1735– 1780 9377276
- [40]Soysal E, Wang J, Jiang M, Wu Y, Pakhomov S, Liu H, Xu H (2017) CLAMP - a toolkit for efficiently building customized clinical natural language processing pipelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc JAMIA. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx132 PMC7378877 29186491 · DOI
- [41]Wu Y, Xu J, Jiang M, Zhang Y, Xu H (2015) A Study of Neural Word Embeddings for Named Entity Recognition in Clinical Text. AMIA Annu Symp Proc AMIA Symp 2015: 1326– 1333 26958273 PMC4765694
- [44]Chapman AB, Peterson KS, Alba PR, DuVall SL, Patterson OV Hybrid system for adverse drug event detection. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 90: 16– 24
- [45]Dandala B, Joopudi V, Devarakonda M IBM Research System at MADE 2018: Detecting Adverse Drug Events from Electronic Health Records. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 90: 39– 47
- [46]Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P (2013) Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35: 1798– 1828 23787338
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fraile Navarro, D., Ijaz, K., Rezazadegan, D., Rahimi-Ardabili, H., Dras, M., Coiera, E., & Berkovsky, S. (2023) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105122 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Yang, X., Bian, J., Fang, R., Bjarnadottir, R. I., Hogan, W. R., & Wu, Y. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocz144 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationA study of deep learning methods for de-identification of clinical notes in cross-institute settings
Yang, X., Lyu, T., Li, Q., Lee, C.-Y., Bian, J., Hogan, W. R., & Wu, Y. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0935-4 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Self-citationContextualized medication information extraction using Transformer-based deep learning architectures
Chen, A., Yu, Z., Yang, X., Guo, Y., Bian, J., & Wu, Y. (2023) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104370 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationYang, X., Zhang, H., He, X., Bian, J., & Wu, Y. (2020) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/22982 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citationArtificial intelligence-based conversational agent to support medication prescribing
Preininger, A. M., South, B., Heiland, J., Buchold, A., Baca, M., Wang, S., Nipper, R., Kutub, N., Bohanan, B., & Jackson, G. P. (2020) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa009 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yang, X., Bian, J., Gong, Y., Hogan, W. R., & Wu, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Florida Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wu, Yonghui
- Venue
- Drug Safety
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-133
- ISSN
- 0114-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-1942
- PMC
- PMC6402874
- OpenAlex
- W2908038241
- Cited by
- 66
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001427)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (CDRN-1501-26692)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Keywords
- adverse drug reactions, clinical natural language processing, relation extraction, pharmacovigilance, clinical notes, recurrent neural networks, long short-term memory
- MeSH terms
- Machine Learning, Humans, Natural Language Processing, Electronic Health Records, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review