Cited by 20Pharmaceutical studies and practicesEpilepsy research and treatmentPharmacy and Medical Practices

Tablet Splitting of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatric Epilepsy: Potential Effect on Plasma Drug Concentrations

Nidanapu, Ravi Prasad, Rajan, Sundaram, Mahadevan, Subramanian, Gitanjali, Batmanabane·2016·Pediatric Drugs

Abstract

Introduction Tablet splitting is the process of dividing a tablet into portions to obtain a prescribed dose of medication. Very few studies have investigated whether split parts of a tablet deliver the expected amount of drug to patients. Objective Our objectives were to evaluate the split parts of adult-dose tablet formulations for percentage of weight deviation, weight uniformity, weight loss, drug content, and the content uniformity of four antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) prescribed to pediatric patients. We also measured AED plasma concentrations in the children. Methods We chose to study first-line AEDs (phenytoin sodium [PHE], sodium valproate [SVA], carbamazepine, and phenobarbitone) as they are routinely prescribed in India. We asked caregivers to perform the same splitting process they follow in their homes on three whole tablets during their routine visit to the outpatient department. After caregivers split the tablets, we studied the weight and content of the split parts. We also used high-performance liquid chromatography to study plasma drug concentrations in children who had received split AEDs for at least 4 months. Results A total of 168 caregivers participated in the study, and we analyzed 1098 split tablet parts. In total, 539 (49.0 %) split parts were above the specified limit of the 2010 Indian Pharmacopeia (IP) acceptable percentage weight deviation (PHE 169 [48.8 %], SVA 187 [51.9 %], carbamazepine 56 [41.1 %], phenobarbitone 127 [49.6 %]); 456 (41.5 %) split…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40272-016-0193-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In one included study, over three-quarters of participants stated they would pay more for a lower dosage strength, with the median amount being 20% over the original prescription price.

    “over three-quarters of participants interviewed within this study stated that they would pay more for a lower dosage strength, with the median amount being 20% over the original price of the prescription.26”
  • In one included study, given the choice, 96.8% of volunteers would prefer a lower-dose formulation rather than splitting a tablet.

    “given the choice, 96.8% of volunteers would prefer a lower-dose formulation rather than splitting a tablet.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nidanapu, R. P., Rajan, S., Mahadevan, S., & Gitanjali, B.
Affiliations
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research (IN)
Venue
Pediatric Drugs
Published
2016-10-05
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
451-463
ISSN
  • 1174-5878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2019
OpenAlex
W2528302134
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
tablet splitting, antiepileptic drugs, pediatric epilepsy, dose accuracy, weight variation, content uniformity, phenytoin sodium, valproic acid, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, plasma drug concentration, caregivers, drug dosing, India
MeSH terms
Anticonvulsants, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, Child, Child, Preschool, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Pediatrics, Tablets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review