The DOI matches its Crossref record.
GLP-1 receptor agonist labelling updated with risk of pulmonary aspiration
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“safety‐related warnings regarding pulmonary aspiration risks in patients undergoing elective procedures were added to GLP‐1 RA labels in November 2024 [19].”
From Association between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist use and peri-operative pulmonary aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cited by
Castrillon, J., Rele, S., Sumithran, P., Hii, M., Thuraisingam, S., Spelman, T., Phan, T., Choong, P., Dowsey, M., & Shadbolt, C. (2025) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.16601 · Cited by 65
“In response, safety-related warnings regarding pulmonary aspiration risks in patients undergoing elective procedures were added to GLP-1 RA labels in November 2024 [19].”
Metadata
- Venue
- Reactions Weekly
- Published
- 2024-11-16
- Volume
- 2034
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-3
- ISSN
- 0114-9954 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2051
- OpenAlex
- W4404372240
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
- www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)
- Locations
- Reactions Weekly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
- Keywords
- GLP-1 receptor agonists, pulmonary aspiration, drug safety, drug labeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GLP-1 receptor agonist labelling updated with risk of pulmonary aspiration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40278-024-70376-5
- The paper
- GLP-1 receptor agonist labelling updated with risk of pulmonary aspiration. (2024). Reactions Weekly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40278-024-70376-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
