Cited by 128Gastrointestinal motility and disordersRegulation of Appetite and ObesityCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Acute Exercise and Gastric Emptying: A Meta-Analysis and Implications for Appetite Control

Open access
Horner, Katy M., Schubert, Matthew M., Desbrow, Ben, Byrne, Nuala M., King, Neil A.·2015·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background Gastric emptying (GE) could influence exercise-induced changes in appetite and energy intake. GE also could contribute to changes in gastric symptoms and the availability of nutrients during exercise, which will subsequently affect performance.Objective The objective of this review was to determine the effects of acute exercise on GE using a systematic review and meta-analysis. The most common parameters to determine GE were selected, consisting of half-emptying time and volume emptied. Oral-caecal transit time (OCTT) was also examined.Data sources Research databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, EBSCOhost, SPORTDiscus) were searched through November 2013 for original studies, abstracts, theses and dissertations that examined the influence of acute exercise on GE.Study selection Studies were included if they evaluated GE or OCTT during and/or after exercise and involved a resting control trial.Study appraisal and synthesis Initially, 195 studies were identified. After evaluation of study characteristics and quality and validity, data from 20 studies (35 trials) involving 221 participants (157 men; 52 women; 12 unknown) were extracted for meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses were utilised for the three main outcome variables, and effect sizes (ES) are reported as Hedge's g due to numerous small sample sizes.Results Random-effects modelling revealed non-significant and small/null main effect sizes for volume emptied (ES = 0.195; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.64), half-time (ES = -0.109, 95% CI -0.66 to 0.44) and OCTT (ES = 0.089; 95% CI -0.64 to 0.82). All analyses exhibited significant heterogeneity and numerous variables moderated the results. There was a dose response of exercise intensity; at lower intensities GE was faster, and at high exercise intensities GE was slower. Walking was associated with faster GE and cycling with slower GE. Greater volume of meal/fluid ingested, higher osmolality of beverage and longer exercise duration were also associated with slower GE with exercise.Limitations The major limitation is that the majority of studies utilised a liquid bolus administered pre-exercise to determine GE; the relationship to post-exercise appetite and energy intake remains unknown. Study populations were also generally active or trained individuals. Furthermore, our review was limited to English language studies and studies that utilised resting control conditions.Conclusions These results suggest that exercise intensity, mode, duration and the nature of meal/fluid ingested all influence GE during and after acute exercise. The relationship of GE parameters with appetite regulation after exercise remains largely unexplored. Further integrative studies combining GE and alterations in gut hormones, as well as in populations such as overweight and obese individuals are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-014-0285-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At higher exercise intensities, such as above 70% VO2max, gastric emptying appears to be delayed.

    “at higher intensities (e.g., above 70% VO2max), gastric emptying appears to be delayed [121–124].”

    From The athletic gut microbiota (2020) · cites this paper as [121]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 109 · Cited by 128

Authors
Horner, K. M., Schubert, M. M., Desbrow, B., Byrne, N. M., & King, N. A.
Affiliations
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Bond University (AU)
Corresponding author
Schubert, Matthew M.
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2014-11-15
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
659-678
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2212951035
Cited by
128
References
109
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • e-publications@bond (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
acute exercise, gastric emptying, half-emptying time, energy intake, exercise intensity, walking, cycling, meal size, exercise duration, gastric symptoms, exercise performance, appetite regulation, dose-response relationship, trained vs untrained subjects
MeSH terms
Beverages, Physical Exertion, Food, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Osmolar Concentration, Time Factors, Exercise, Portion Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review