The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concussion Recovery Time Among High School and Collegiate Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
BackgroundConcussion diagnosis and management is made through the clinical exam using assessment tools that include self-report symptomatology, postural control, and cognitive evaluations. The specific timing of concussion resolution varies between individuals. However, despite a lack of research in concussion recovery, it is widely accepted that the majority of young adults will recover in 7–10 days, with youth athletes taking longer.ObjectivesThe purpose of this review is to directly compare the recovery duration among high school and collegiate athletes on symptom reports and cognitive assessments following concussion.Data SourcesData were collected from a literature search comprising high school or college athletes only. This included studies (n = 6) that reported symptom or cognitive performance recovery to the exact day.ResultsHigh school athletes self-reported symptom recovery at 15 days compared with 6 days in collegiate athletes. Both college and high school athletes showed cognitive recovery at similar rates of 5 and 7 days.LimitationsThis review only included articles that were directly related to concussed high school or college athletes. Additionally, athletes in the high school and college setting typically receive a battery of neurocognitive tests that may not be as sensitive or as comprehensive as a full neuropsychological exam.ConclusionThe review finds that neurocognitive recovery rates are similar among high school and college athletes, while symptom reporting shows longer recovery time points in high school than in college.Implications of Key FindingsAn individualized and stepwise concussion management plan is important for proper concussion recovery regardless of age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981
Meta-analysis of experiments with matched groups or repeated measures designs
Dunlap, W. P., Cortina, J. M., Vaslow, J. B., & Burke, M. J. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.2.170 · Cited by 1,693 · cited 1×
“, day zero) and dividing the difference by the recovery day standard deviation [28, 29].”
BackgroundField, M., Collins, M. W., Lovell, M. R., & Maroon, J. (2003) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1067/mpd.2003.190 · Cited by 802
REEVES, T., PHILLIPS, L., & POVLISHOCK, J. (2005) · Experimental Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.07.014 · Cited by 270
Cited by
Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review
Iverson, G. L., Gardner, A. J., Terry, D. P., Ponsford, J. L., Sills, A. K., Broshek, D. K., & Solomon, G. S. (2017) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2017-097729 · Cited by 917
Sport-Related Concussion in Children and Adolescents
Halstead, M. E., Walter, K. D., Moffatt, K., COUNCIL ON SPORTS MEDICINE AND FITNESS, LaBella, C. R., Brooks, M. A., Canty, G., Diamond, A. B., Hennrikus, W., Logan, K., et al. (2018) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2018-3074 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, R. M., Puetz, T. W., Giza, C. C., & Broglio, S. P.
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2015-03-28
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 893-903
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2060516585
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
