Effects of Resistance Training on Lower-Extremity Muscle Power in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Background Resistance training (RT) has been investigated as a potential intervention strategy for improving muscle function, but the effects on lower-extremity muscle power in middle-aged and older adults have not been systematically reviewed. Objective The aim of this meta-analysis is to provide a quantitative estimate of the effect of RT on lower-extremity muscle power in middle-aged and older adults and to examine independent moderators of this relationship. Methods Randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of RT on either leg press (LP) or knee extension (KE) muscle power in adults aged ≥50 years were included. Data were aggregated with meta-analytic techniques, and multi-level modeling was used to adjust for nesting effects. A total of 52 effects from 12 randomized controlled trials were analyzed with a random-effects model to estimate the effect of RT on lower-extremity muscle power. A multiple-regression analysis was conducted to examine independent moderators of the mean effect. Results The adjusted aggregated results from all studies indicate that RT has a small-to-moderate effect on lower-extremity muscle power (Hedges' d = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.43), which translated to 54.90 watts (95 % CI 40.37-69.43). Meta-regression analyses indicated that high-velocity RT was superior to traditional RT (Δ = 0.62 vs. 0.20, respectively) for increasing lower-extremity muscle power. In addition, training volume significantly moderated the effect o…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Resistance training improves power compared with no exercise (CTRL) in healthy adults.
“Compared with CTRL, power was enhanced by standard RT (41,48–50,148).”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 76 · Cited by 162
- Authors
- Straight, C. R., Lindheimer, J. B., Brady, A. O., Dishman, R. K., & Evans, E. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
- Corresponding author
- Straight, Chad R.
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2015-11-06
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-364
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2113601610
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 1.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- resistance training, middle-aged and older adults, leg press, knee extension, training volume, exercise prescription, muscle function
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Muscle, Skeletal, Lower Extremity, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Physical Conditioning, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review