Cited by 162Sports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiologyPhysical Activity and Health

Effects of Resistance Training on Lower-Extremity Muscle Power in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Straight, Chad R., Lindheimer, Jacob B., Brady, Anne O., Dishman, Rodney K., Evans, Ellen M.·2016·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background Resistance training (RT) has been investigated as a potential intervention strategy for improving muscle function, but the effects on lower-extremity muscle power in middle-aged and older adults have not been systematically reviewed. Objective The aim of this meta-analysis is to provide a quantitative estimate of the effect of RT on lower-extremity muscle power in middle-aged and older adults and to examine independent moderators of this relationship. Methods Randomized controlled trials that examined the effects of RT on either leg press (LP) or knee extension (KE) muscle power in adults aged ≥50 years were included. Data were aggregated with meta-analytic techniques, and multi-level modeling was used to adjust for nesting effects. A total of 52 effects from 12 randomized controlled trials were analyzed with a random-effects model to estimate the effect of RT on lower-extremity muscle power. A multiple-regression analysis was conducted to examine independent moderators of the mean effect. Results The adjusted aggregated results from all studies indicate that RT has a small-to-moderate effect on lower-extremity muscle power (Hedges' d = 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.43), which translated to 54.90 watts (95 % CI 40.37-69.43). Meta-regression analyses indicated that high-velocity RT was superior to traditional RT (Δ = 0.62 vs. 0.20, respectively) for increasing lower-extremity muscle power. In addition, training volume significantly moderated the effect o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-015-0418-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 76 · Cited by 162

Authors
Straight, C. R., Lindheimer, J. B., Brady, A. O., Dishman, R. K., & Evans, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
Corresponding author
Straight, Chad R.
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2015-11-06
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
353-364
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2113601610
Cited by
162
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
resistance training, middle-aged and older adults, leg press, knee extension, training volume, exercise prescription, muscle function
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Muscle, Skeletal, Lower Extremity, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training, Physical Conditioning, Human

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review