Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners
Open accessAbstract
Resistance training is essential for health and performance and confers many benefits such as increasing skeletal muscle mass, increasing strength and power output, and improving metabolic health. Resistance training is a major component of the physical activity guidelines, yet research in female populations is limited. Recent increases in the promotion of, and the participation by, females in sport and exercise, highlight the need for an increase in understanding of evidence-based best practice exercise prescription for females. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current research regarding resistance training performance and skeletal muscle adaptation in females, with a focus on the hormonal variables that may influence resistance training outcomes. Findings suggest that the menstrual cycle phase may impact strength, but not skeletal muscle protein metabolism. In comparison, oral contraception use in females may reduce skeletal muscle protein synthesis, but not strength outcomes, when compared to non-users. Future research should investigate the role of resistance training in the maintenance of skeletal muscle protein metabolism during pregnancy, menopause and in athletes experiencing relative energy deficiency in sport. The review concludes with recommendations for researchers to assist them in the inclusion of female participants in resistance training research specifically, with commentary on the most appropriate methods of controlling for, or understanding the implications of, hormonal fluctuations. For practitioners, the current evidence suggests possible resistance training practices that could optimise performance outcomes in females, although further research is warranted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Muscle FSR is similar in both sexes.
“Males and females were included as previous work demonstrated that muscle FSR, our primary outcome, is similar in both sexes (Knowles et al., 2019; West et al., 1985).”
From The effect of acute sleep deprivation on skeletal muscle protein synthesis and the hormonal environment (2021) · cites this paper as Knowles et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 131 · Cited by 48
- Authors
- Knowles, O. E., Aisbett, B., Main, L. C., Drinkwater, E. J., Orellana, L., & Lamon, S.
- Affiliations
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lamon, Séverine
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2019-06-12
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1637-1650
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2951921414
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 131
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- resistance training, skeletal muscle protein metabolism, eumenorrhea, menstrual cycle, oral contraception, muscle protein synthesis, strength, hormonal fluctuations, female athletes, relative energy deficiency in sport, pregnancy, menopause, exercise prescription
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Muscle Proteins, Sex Factors, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review