Cited by 48Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners

Open access
Knowles, Olivia E., Aisbett, Brad, Main, Luana C., Drinkwater, Eric J., Orellana, Liliana, Lamon, Séverine·2019·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Resistance training is essential for health and performance and confers many benefits such as increasing skeletal muscle mass, increasing strength and power output, and improving metabolic health. Resistance training is a major component of the physical activity guidelines, yet research in female populations is limited. Recent increases in the promotion of, and the participation by, females in sport and exercise, highlight the need for an increase in understanding of evidence-based best practice exercise prescription for females. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the current research regarding resistance training performance and skeletal muscle adaptation in females, with a focus on the hormonal variables that may influence resistance training outcomes. Findings suggest that the menstrual cycle phase may impact strength, but not skeletal muscle protein metabolism. In comparison, oral contraception use in females may reduce skeletal muscle protein synthesis, but not strength outcomes, when compared to non-users. Future research should investigate the role of resistance training in the maintenance of skeletal muscle protein metabolism during pregnancy, menopause and in athletes experiencing relative energy deficiency in sport. The review concludes with recommendations for researchers to assist them in the inclusion of female participants in resistance training research specifically, with commentary on the most appropriate methods of controlling for, or understanding the implications of, hormonal fluctuations. For practitioners, the current evidence suggests possible resistance training practices that could optimise performance outcomes in females, although further research is warranted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-019-01132-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 131 · Cited by 48

Authors
Knowles, O. E., Aisbett, B., Main, L. C., Drinkwater, E. J., Orellana, L., & Lamon, S.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lamon, Séverine
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2019-06-12
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
1637-1650
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2951921414
Cited by
48
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, skeletal muscle protein metabolism, eumenorrhea, menstrual cycle, oral contraception, muscle protein synthesis, strength, hormonal fluctuations, female athletes, relative energy deficiency in sport, pregnancy, menopause, exercise prescription
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal, Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Muscle Proteins, Sex Factors, Gonadal Steroid Hormones, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review