Cited by 54Sports Performance and TrainingLower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Effect of Strength Training on Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Variables in Distance Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Trowell, Danielle, Vicenzino, Bill, Saunders, Natalie, Fox, Aaron, Bonacci, Jason·2020·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background Concurrent strength and endurance (CSE) training improves distance running performance more than endurance training alone, but the mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon are unclear. It has been hypothesised that biomechanical or neuromuscular adaptations are responsible for improvements in running performance; however, evidence on this topic has not been synthesised in a review. Objective To evaluate the effect of CSE training on biomechanical and neuromuscular variables in distance runners. Methods Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2018 using key terms related to running and strength training. Studies were included if the following criteria were met: (1) population: 'distance' or 'endurance' runners of any training status; (2) intervention: CSE training; (3) comparator: running-only control group; (4) outcomes: at least one biomechanical or neuromuscular variable; and, (5) study design: randomised and non-randomised comparative training studies. Biomechanical and neuromuscular variables of interest included: (1) kinematic, kinetic or electromyography outcome measures captured during running; (2) lower body muscle force, strength or power outcome measures; and (3) lower body muscle-tendon stiffness outcome measures. Methodological quality and risk of bias for each study were assessed using the PEDro scale. The level of evidence for each variable was categorised according to the quantity and PEDro rating of the included studies. B…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-019-01184-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 72 · Cited by 54

Authors
Trowell, D., Vicenzino, B., Saunders, N., Fox, A., & Bonacci, J.
Affiliations
  • Australian Sports Commission (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Bonacci, Jason
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2019-09-20
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
133-150
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2973459682
Cited by
54
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
long-distance runners, endurance runners, running performance, running biomechanics, neuromuscular adaptation, knee flexion, ankle plantarflexion, squat strength, jump height, muscle force, muscle power, muscle-tendon stiffness, electromyography, lower limb muscle strength, running kinematics, running kinetics, resistance training, endurance training
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Physical Endurance, Running, Lower Extremity, Resistance Training, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review