Effect of Strength Training on Biomechanical and Neuromuscular Variables in Distance Runners: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background Concurrent strength and endurance (CSE) training improves distance running performance more than endurance training alone, but the mechanisms underpinning this phenomenon are unclear. It has been hypothesised that biomechanical or neuromuscular adaptations are responsible for improvements in running performance; however, evidence on this topic has not been synthesised in a review. Objective To evaluate the effect of CSE training on biomechanical and neuromuscular variables in distance runners. Methods Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to November 2018 using key terms related to running and strength training. Studies were included if the following criteria were met: (1) population: 'distance' or 'endurance' runners of any training status; (2) intervention: CSE training; (3) comparator: running-only control group; (4) outcomes: at least one biomechanical or neuromuscular variable; and, (5) study design: randomised and non-randomised comparative training studies. Biomechanical and neuromuscular variables of interest included: (1) kinematic, kinetic or electromyography outcome measures captured during running; (2) lower body muscle force, strength or power outcome measures; and (3) lower body muscle-tendon stiffness outcome measures. Methodological quality and risk of bias for each study were assessed using the PEDro scale. The level of evidence for each variable was categorised according to the quantity and PEDro rating of the included studies. B…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There were insufficient data to determine if power is affected by fatigue/failure, unstable surfaces, or concurrent training.
“There were insufficient data to determine if power was affected by fatigue/failure (99), unstable surfaces (70), or concurrent training (123,124,151).”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 72 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Trowell, D., Vicenzino, B., Saunders, N., Fox, A., & Bonacci, J.
- Affiliations
- Australian Sports Commission (AU)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Bonacci, Jason
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2019-09-20
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-150
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2973459682
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- long-distance runners, endurance runners, running performance, running biomechanics, neuromuscular adaptation, knee flexion, ankle plantarflexion, squat strength, jump height, muscle force, muscle power, muscle-tendon stiffness, electromyography, lower limb muscle strength, running kinematics, running kinetics, resistance training, endurance training
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Physical Endurance, Running, Lower Extremity, Resistance Training, Athletes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review