Menstrual Cycle: The Importance of Both the Phases and the Transitions Between Phases on Training and Performance
Open accessAbstract
The authors present opinions based on their applied experiences of working with female athletes in combination with the existing evidence-based literature. Most of the existing menstrual cycle research focuses on a few steady-state time points within the pre-defined menstrual cycle phases, yet this disregards the day-to-day hormonal changes that women have to accommodate to perform optimally and consistently. The traditional research models are inadequate for studying symptoms and symptom management, and ultimately for supporting athletes to perform well throughout the entirety of their cycle. As such, the monitoring of the day-to-day variation, particularly during the transitions between menstrual cycle phases appears to be an important “overlooked” consideration. This is particularly pertinent considering the known intra-individual and inter-individual variation in menstrual cycle characteristics. Anecdotal and research evidence supports the idea that athletes can use non-pharmacological solutions to mitigate negative menstrual cycle symptoms and do not need to “grit their teeth and roll with it”. However, further research (including case studies) is needed in this important research area. Such knowledge should be and needs to be widespread amongst practitioners and athletes as they should not have to figure this out alone. As such, researchers and practitioners need to put more work into understanding symptom aetiology, symptom clusters and their relationship with hormonal changes, menstrual cycle phases and transitions, with potential for a profound impact on individual athlete health and well-being. In so doing, those working with female athletes need to continue building on the recent progress made in educating athletes and practitioners; for example, normalising the discussion of and about the menstrual cycle and all of its implications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The length of a normal menstrual cycle is 21 to 40 days.
“the length of a normal menstrual cycle is 21 to 40 days [89]”
From International society of sports nutrition position stand: nutritional concerns of the female athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [89]
The Symptom Burden section says menstrual-cycle length varies between and within individuals, but gives no normal range. Searches for “21 to 40 days” and a normal cycle-length range found no passage establishing those bounds; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 82
- Authors
- Bruinvels, G., Hackney, A. C., & Pedlar, C. R.
- Affiliations
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bruinvels, Georgie
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2022-04-29
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1457-1460
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- PMC
- PMC9213297
- OpenAlex
- W4225159052
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 12.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- St Mary's University Repository (ULCC) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- menstrual cycle, female athletes, menstrual cycle phases, menstrual symptoms, symptom management, non-pharmacological treatment, athletic performance
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Menstrual Cycle, Athletes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review