Cited by 18Sports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutritionCardiovascular and exercise physiology

The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains

Pelland, Joshua C., Remmert, Jacob F., Robinson, Zac P., Hinson, Seth R., Zourdos, Michael C.·2026·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background Weekly set volume and frequency are used to manipulate resistance training dosage. Previous research has identified higher weekly set volume as enhancing muscle hypertrophy and strength gains, but the nature of the dose-response relationship still needs to be investigated. Mixed evidence exists regarding the effects of higher weekly frequency. Objective We aimed to explore the dose-response relationships between key resistance training dosage variables (weekly set volume and frequency) and strength and hypertrophy. Methods Before meta-analyzing the volume and frequency research, all contributing resistance training sets were classified as direct or indirect, depending on their specificity to the hypertrophy/strength measurement. Then, weekly set volume/frequency for indirect sets was quantified as 1 for 'total,' 0.5 for 'fractional,' and 0 for 'direct.' A series of multi-level meta-regressions were performed for muscle hypertrophy and strength, utilizing 67 total studies of 2058 participants (79.1% male, 20.9% female; average age 25.16 ± 5.22 years). All models were adjusted for the duration of the intervention and training status. Results The relative evidence for the 'fractional' quantification method was strongest; therefore, this quantification method was used for the primary meta-regression models. The posterior probability of the marginal slope exceeding zero for the effect of volume on both hypertrophy and strength was 100%, indicating that gains in muscle s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-025-02344-w

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 135 · Cited by 18

Authors
Pelland, J. C., Remmert, J. F., Robinson, Z. P., Hinson, S. R., & Zourdos, M. C.
Affiliations
Florida Atlantic University (US)
Corresponding author
Zourdos, Michael C.
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2025-12-04
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
481-505
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W4416976998
Cited by
18
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 18
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, dose-response relationship, exercise frequency, muscle hypertrophy, strength gain, diminishing returns, training dose
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Regression Analysis, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review