The Resistance Training Dose Response: Meta-Regressions Exploring the Effects of Weekly Volume and Frequency on Muscle Hypertrophy and Strength Gains
Abstract
Background Weekly set volume and frequency are used to manipulate resistance training dosage. Previous research has identified higher weekly set volume as enhancing muscle hypertrophy and strength gains, but the nature of the dose-response relationship still needs to be investigated. Mixed evidence exists regarding the effects of higher weekly frequency. Objective We aimed to explore the dose-response relationships between key resistance training dosage variables (weekly set volume and frequency) and strength and hypertrophy. Methods Before meta-analyzing the volume and frequency research, all contributing resistance training sets were classified as direct or indirect, depending on their specificity to the hypertrophy/strength measurement. Then, weekly set volume/frequency for indirect sets was quantified as 1 for 'total,' 0.5 for 'fractional,' and 0 for 'direct.' A series of multi-level meta-regressions were performed for muscle hypertrophy and strength, utilizing 67 total studies of 2058 participants (79.1% male, 20.9% female; average age 25.16 ± 5.22 years). All models were adjusted for the duration of the intervention and training status. Results The relative evidence for the 'fractional' quantification method was strongest; therefore, this quantification method was used for the primary meta-regression models. The posterior probability of the marginal slope exceeding zero for the effect of volume on both hypertrophy and strength was 100%, indicating that gains in muscle s…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A dose-response for volume plateaus and shows diminishing returns beyond ~2-3 sets/exercise for strength and ~18-20 weekly sets for hypertrophy.
“A meta-regression (187) of the effect of volume (weekly) sets showed progression, but as expected, a dose-response that plateaued and showed diminishing returns beyond ~2–3 sets/exercise for strength and ~18–20 weekly sets for hypertrophy with varying loads; thus, healthy adults are advised to complete at least two sets per exercise.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 135 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Pelland, J. C., Remmert, J. F., Robinson, Z. P., Hinson, S. R., & Zourdos, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Florida Atlantic University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zourdos, Michael C.
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2025-12-04
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 481-505
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W4416976998
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Keywords
- resistance training, dose-response relationship, exercise frequency, muscle hypertrophy, strength gain, diminishing returns, training dose
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Hypertrophy, Male, Regression Analysis, Muscle, Skeletal, Muscle Strength, Resistance Training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review