Decentralisation in Clinical Trials and Patient Centricity: Benefits and Challenges
Abstract
Decentralised clinical trials (DCTs) encompass various terms such as virtual, home-based, remote and siteless trials. The objectives of DCTs are to enhance the ease of participation for patients in clinical trials by minimising or removing the necessity for trial subjects to travel to the trial sites. This approach has been shown to reduce drop-out rates, increase study effectiveness and ultimately get life-altering drugs to market faster-saving sponsors billions. At the outset, DCTs deploy a wide range of digital technologies to collect safety and efficacy data from study participants, providing study treatments and performing investigations from the comfort of the patient's own home. The aim of decentralised trials includes patient centricity, enhanced efficacy in clinical trial conduct and generating real-world data. This is done by not only making it convenient for the patient to participate in the trial execution, but also involving them from the planning stage and taking their inputs during designing of trials and consenting documentation, understanding their treatment requirements and designing the studies accordingly. Various regulatory authorities have published guidelines governing DCT principles, especially after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) experience of undertaking multicentric clinical trials. Both United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have newer, recently updated guidelines to capture this growing reality to undertake clinical trials using patient technology or patient-centric technologies. Other regulatory agencies are accepting data generated using decentralised and patient-centric technologies and making an effort to include elements of decentralised trials in their regulatory guidelines. Decentralised trials follow a hybrid approach to have a balanced mix of remote and in-person data collection and trial procedures. Decentralised and patient-centric approaches are the future of any organisation for the conduct of clinical trials. Globally, all sponsor pharmaceutical companies must start undertaking drug development and clinical trials using a decentralised approach while keeping patient centricity in mind.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The decentralised design may have provided an opportunity for greater diversity in the trial population.
“As suggested previously,60 the decentralised design may also have provided an opportunity for greater diversity in our trial population.”
Cites
Digitally Enabled, Patient‐Centric Clinical Trials: Shifting the Drug Development Paradigm
Dockendorf, M. F., Hansen, B. J., Bateman, K. P., Moyer, M., Shah, J. K., & Shipley, L. A. (2021) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12910 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hesketh, K., Low, J., Andrews, R., Blitz, S., Buckley, B., Falkenhain, K., Job, J., Jones, C. A., Jones, H., Jung, M. E., et al. (2025) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092260 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sinha, S. D., Chary Sriramadasu, S., Raphael, R., & Roy, S.
- Affiliations
- Hetero Drugs (India) (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Sinha, Shubhadeep D.
- Venue
- Pharmaceutical Medicine
- Published
- 2024-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-120
- ISSN
- 0265-0673 (ISSN-L)
- 1178-2595
- 1179-1993
- OpenAlex
- W4392564369
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Pharmaceutical Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
- Keywords
- decentralized clinical trials, patient-centricity, remote data acquisition, digital health technologies, real-world data, clinical trial regulation, FDA guidance, EMA guidelines, trial participant retention
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Patients, Politics, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review