Yoga as an intervention for PTSD: a theoretical rationale and review of the literature
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Medium effect size was selected based on findings from previous yoga trials.
“Medium effect size was selected based on finding from previous yoga trials [73]”
From A randomized controlled trial of yoga vs nonaerobic exercise for veterans with PTSD: Understanding efficacy, mechanisms of change, and mode of delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 90 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Wells, S. Y., Lang, A. J., Schmalzl, L., Groessl, E. J., & Strauss, J. L.
- Affiliations
- San Diego State University (US)
- University of California San Diego (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wells, Stephanie Y.
- Venue
- Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry
- Published
- 2016-01-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 60-72
- ISSN
- 2196-3061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2304849379
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 3.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Current Treatment Options in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- yoga, post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD symptom reduction, trauma-sensitive yoga, coping, theoretical rationale, psychotherapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
