Climate and Trade Policy for Risk Management: The Need for Geopolitical Analytical Frameworks for Supply Chain and Energy System Modeling
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Each LIB component has its own extensive supply chain with unique and shared challenges including geopolitical risk and production concentration that LIB producers and consumers increasingly need to be cognizant of.
“Each of these components have their own extensive supply chains with unique and shared challenges including geopolitical risk and production concentration that LIB producers and consumers increasingly need to be cognizant of [3].”
From Mapping the Supply Chain of Lithium-Ion Battery Metals from Mine to Primary Processing by Country and Corporation (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 52 · Cited by 3
- Authors
- Jones, E. C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jones, Erick C.
- ORCID
- Jones, Erick C.
- Venue
- Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports
- Published
- 2025-04-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2196-3010 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4409253007
- Semantic Scholar
- e34bb5d7bec4aa4df16853cf21bf85d058943e9b
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › General Energy › Global Energy Security and Policy
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
- Keywords
- climate policy, trade policy, geopolitics, supply chain risk, energy system modelling, analytical framework, trade barriers, climate risk management, energy planning, carbon modeling, international trade
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
