Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Ethics and bioethics in healthcarePublic Health Policies and EducationHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coercing for public health: (when) is coercion ethically justified?

Open access
Johnson, Tess, Abdool Karim, Safura, Faure, Marlyn, Shaffer, Jonathan·2025·Monash Bioethics Review
DOI 10.1007/s40592-025-00243-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40592-025-00243-4

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Coker, Richard. 2000. From Chaos to coercion: Detention and the control of tuberculosis. London: St Martin’s Press.
  2. Woskie, Liana. Forthcoming. Contemporary human rights violations in female sterilization care: Legal and ethical considerations when coerced patients do consent. Monash Bioethics Review.

Cited by

See all 1

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, T., Abdool Karim, S., Faure, M., & Shaffer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Tess
ORCID
Venue
Monash Bioethics Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2025-04-29
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
225-228
ISSN
  • 1321-2753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1836-6716
DOI
10.1007/s40592-025-00243-4
OpenAlex
W4409918292
Cited by
1
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Bioethics News (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (221719)
  • Moh Family Foundation, Pandemic Sciences Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
coercion, public health ethics, public health policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coercing for public health: (when) is coercion ethically justified? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40592-025-00243-4
The paper
Johnson, T., Abdool Karim, S., Faure, M., & Shaffer, J. (2025). Coercing for public health: (when) is coercion ethically justified? Monash Bioethics Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-025-00243-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.