Educating software and ai stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics
Open accessAbstract
This paper discusses educating stakeholders of algorithmic systems (systems that apply Artificial Intelligence/Machine learning algorithms) in the areas of algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics (FATE). We begin by establishing the need for such education and identifying the intended consumers of educational materials on the topic. We discuss the topics of greatest concern and in need of educational resources; we also survey the existing materials and past experiences in such education, noting the scarcity of suitable material on aspects of fairness in particular. We use an example of a college admission platform to illustrate our ideas. We conclude with recommendations for further work in the area and report on the first steps taken towards achieving this goal in the framework of an academic graduate seminar course, a graduate summer school, an embedded lecture in a software engineering course, and a workshop for high school teachers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Such systems can perpetuate existing biases in the training data from human decision-making in the past.
“Aside from the obvious potential risks of worthy applicants getting rejected or unworthy applicants getting in, such systems can perpetuate existing biases in the training data from human decision-making in the past (Bogina et al., 2022).”
From Proactive and reactive engagement of artificial intelligence methods for education: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Bogina et al., 2022
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 61 · Cited by 142
- Authors
- Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., & Shulner-Tal, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Haifa (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Bogina, Veronika
- Venue
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 808-833
- ISSN
- 1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3159960173
- Cited by
- 142
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 18.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- H2020 European Research Council (810105, 824588)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- algorithmic fairness, algorithmic accountability, algorithmic transparency, AI ethics, stakeholder education, teaching materials, algorithmic bias, software engineering education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review