Cited by 142Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Teaching and Learning Programming

Educating software and ai stakeholders about algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics

Open access
Bogina, Veronika, Hartman, Alan, Kuflik, Tsvi, Shulner-Tal, Avital·2022·International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

This paper discusses educating stakeholders of algorithmic systems (systems that apply Artificial Intelligence/Machine learning algorithms) in the areas of algorithmic fairness, accountability, transparency and ethics (FATE). We begin by establishing the need for such education and identifying the intended consumers of educational materials on the topic. We discuss the topics of greatest concern and in need of educational resources; we also survey the existing materials and past experiences in such education, noting the scarcity of suitable material on aspects of fairness in particular. We use an example of a college admission platform to illustrate our ideas. We conclude with recommendations for further work in the area and report on the first steps taken towards achieving this goal in the framework of an academic graduate seminar course, a graduate summer school, an embedded lecture in a software engineering course, and a workshop for high school teachers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40593-021-00248-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Such systems can perpetuate existing biases in the training data from human decision-making in the past.

    “Aside from the obvious potential risks of worthy applicants getting rejected or unworthy applicants getting in, such systems can perpetuate existing biases in the training data from human decision-making in the past (Bogina et al., 2022).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 142

Authors
Bogina, V., Hartman, A., Kuflik, T., & Shulner-Tal, A.
Affiliations
University of Haifa (IL)
Corresponding author
Bogina, Veronika
Venue
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
808-833
ISSN
1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159960173
Cited by
142
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
18.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council (810105, 824588)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
algorithmic fairness, algorithmic accountability, algorithmic transparency, AI ethics, stakeholder education, teaching materials, algorithmic bias, software engineering education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review