Cited by 25Diversity and Career in MedicineMedical Education and AdmissionsCareer Development and Diversity

SEALS: an Innovative Pipeline Program Targeting Obstacles to Diversity in the Physician Workforce

Fritz, Cassandra D. L., Press, Valerie G., Nabers, Darrell, Levinson, Dana, Humphrey, Holly, Vela, Monica B.·2016·Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Abstract

Objective Medical schools may find implementing pipeline programs for minority pre-medical students prohibitive due to a number of factors including the lack of well-described programs in the literature, the limited evidence for program development, and institutional financial barriers. Our goals were to (1) design a pipeline program based on educational theory; (2) deliver the program in a low cost, sustainable manner; and (3) evaluate intermediate outcomes of the program. Methods SEALS is a 6-week program based on an asset bundles model designed to promote: (1) socialization and professionalism, (2) education in science learning tools, (3) acquisition of finance literacy, (4) the leveraging of mentorship and networks, and (5) social expectations and resilience, among minority pre-medical students. This is a prospective mixed methods study. Students completed survey instruments pre-program, post-program, and 6 months post-program, establishing intermediate outcome measures. Results Thirteen students matriculated to SEALS. The SEALS cohort rated themselves as improved or significantly improved when asked to rate their familiarity with MCAT components (p Conclusions This low-cost, high-quality, program can be undertaken by medical schools interested in promoting a diverse workforce that may ultimately begin to address and reduce health care disparities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40615-015-0131-x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fritz, C. D. L., Press, V. G., Nabers, D., Levinson, D., Humphrey, H., & Vela, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Published
2015-05-28
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
225-232
ISSN
  • 2196-8837 (ISSN-L)
  • 2197-3792
OpenAlex
W1119968866
Cited by
25
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Chicago
  • Pritzker School of Medicine
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
Keywords
physician workforce diversity, professionalism, mentoring, financial literacy, letters of recommendation, interview skills, medical school admissions
MeSH terms
Humans, Mentors, Minority Groups, Prospective Studies, Schools, Medical, Program Development, Cultural Diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review