The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs
Open accessAbstract
The scholarly literature often distinguishes between so-called opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship and between “pull” and “push” motivations. Despite the pervasive use of this terminology, empirical analyses are mostly based on a single country. The present paper contributes by investigating business owner survey data for the United States and 32 countries in Europe and Asia. We analyze the differences between business owners motivated by opportunity and necessity in terms of their (1) socioeconomic characteristics, (2) personality, and (3) perceptions of entrepreneurial support. Descriptive statistics reveal that the two groups of business owners have very different profiles along these three dimensions. Moreover, multinomial logit regressions indicate that the determinants of business ownership (versus paid employment) differ for opportunity and necessity business ownership. A specific result of the present study (covering all 33 countries) is that the probability of being an opportunity versus a necessity business owner is higher for male, younger, wealthier, proactive, and optimistic business owners. Furthermore, those who prefer being a business owner and those who have more favorable perceptions of financial start-up support are more likely to be an opportunity versus a necessity business owner.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Knight, F. H. (1921) · Cited by 9,948
Journal of Small Business Management
(2020) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-627x · Cited by 6,641
Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research
Harrison, R., Brush, C. G., Davidsson, P., Fiet, J. O., Greene, P. G., Lerner, M., Mason, C., Meyer, G. D., & Sohl, J. (2004) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · Cited by 2,492
The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship
Licht, A. N., & Siegel, J. I. (2009) · The Oxford Handbook of Entrepreneurship · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199546992.003.0019 · Cited by 2,072
Encyclopedia of entrepreneurshipPreprint
Kent, C. A., Sexton, D. L., & Vesper, K. H. (1982) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 1,807
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: Data Collection Design and Implementation 1998?2003
Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Chin, N. (2005) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-005-1980-1 · Cited by 1,780
Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data
Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-005-2000-1 · Cited by 1,643
The social dimensions of entrepreneurship
(2006) · Strategic Direction · doi:10.1108/sd.2006.05622aaf.007 · Cited by 1,581
Self-regulation through goal setting
Latham, G. P., & Locke, E. A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90021-k · Cited by 1,370
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Hessels, J.
- Venue
- Eurasian Business Review
- Published
- 2016-11-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-295
- ISSN
- 1309-422X (ISSN-L)
- 1309-4297
- 2147-4281
- OpenAlex
- W2158540705
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 52.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40821-016-0065-1
- The paper
- van der Zwan, P., Thurik, R., Verheul, I., & Hessels, J. (2016). Factors influencing the entrepreneurial engagement of opportunity and necessity entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-016-0065-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.