Cited by 182Emotion and Mood RecognitionNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotion Recognition from Multimodal Physiological Signals for Emotion Aware Healthcare Systems

Open access
Ayata, Değer, Yaslan, Yusuf, Kamasak, Mustafa E.·2020·Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to propose a novel emotion recognition algorithm from multimodal physiological signals for emotion aware healthcare systems. In this work, physiological signals are collected from a respiratory belt (RB), photoplethysmography (PPG), and fingertip temperature (FTT) sensors. These signals are used as their collection becomes easy with the advance in ergonomic wearable technologies. Methods: Arousal and valence levels are recognized from the fused physiological signals using the relationship between physiological signals and emotions. This recognition is performed using various machine learning methods such as random forest, support vector machine and logistic regression. The performance of these methods is studied. Results: Using decision level fusion, the accuracy improved from 69.86 to 73.08% for arousal, and from 69.53 to 72.18% for valence. Results indicate that using multiple sources of physiological signals and their fusion increases the accuracy rate of emotion recognition. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a framework for emotion recognition using multimodal physiological signals from respiratory belt, photo plethysmography and fingertip temperature. It is shown that decision level fusion from multiple classifiers (one per signal source) improved the accuracy rate of emotion recognition both for arousal and valence dimensions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40846-019-00505-7

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Popat, K. A. & Sharma, P. (2013). Wearable computer applications: A feature perspective. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Innovation, 3(1). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ec9c/33e897e38e691f60baf828303a0ae64e1899.pdf.
  2. Peng, H., Ding, C., & Long, F. (2005) Minimum redundancy maximum relevance feature selection (MRMR). IEEE Intelligent Systems, 20. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237133616_Minimum_Redundancy-_Maximum_Relevance_Feature_Selection. Accessed May 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Ayata, D., Yaslan, Y., & Kamasak, M. E.
Affiliations
Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Ayata, Değer
Venue
Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering
Published
2020-01-07
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
149-157
ISSN
  • 1609-0985 (ISSN-L)
  • 2199-4757
OpenAlex
W2999294457
Cited by
182
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 4
FWCI
18.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Istanbul Technical University Academic Open Archive (Istanbul Technical University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
emotion recognition, multimodal physiological signals, valence and arousal, decision fusion, photoplethysmography, fingertip temperature, wearable sensors, classifier combination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review