Cited by 54Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Utilization of industrial waste—Based geopolymers as a soil stabilizer—A review

Sharma, Kuldeep, Kumar, Arvind·2020·Innovative Infrastructure Solutions

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41062-020-00350-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, K., & Kumar, A.
Affiliations
Dr. B. R. Ambedkar National Institute of Technology Jalandhar (IN)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Kuldeep
Venue
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions
Published
2020-08-12
Volume
5
Issue
3
ISSN
  • 2364-4176 (ISSN-L)
  • 2364-4184
OpenAlex
W3048439429
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
soil stabilization, water-to-binder ratio, curing time, geotechnical properties, microstructure, calcium silicate hydrate, soil improvement, CO2 emission reduction, waste utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review