The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment
Open accessAbstract
We review detection methods that are currently in use or have been proposed to search for a stochastic background of gravitational radiation. We consider both Bayesian and frequentist searches using ground-based and space-based laser interferometers, spacecraft Doppler tracking, and pulsar timing arrays; and we allow for anisotropy, non-Gaussianity, and non-standard polarization states. Our focus is on relevant data analysis issues, and not on the particular astrophysical or early Universe sources that might give rise to such backgrounds. We provide a unified treatment of these searches at the level of detector response functions, detection sensitivity curves, and, more generally, at the level of the likelihood function, since the choice of signal and noise models and prior probability distributions are actually what define the search. Pedagogical examples are given whenever possible to compare and contrast different approaches. We have tried to make the article as self-contained and comprehensive as possible, targeting graduate students and new researchers looking to enter this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Spergel, D. N., Tucker, G. S., et al. (2003) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/377253 · Cited by 4,860
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1954) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1954.10501232 · Cited by 2,450
Bayesian estimation supersedes the t-test
Kruschke, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0029146 · Cited by 1,530
Gregory, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791277 · Cited by 750
Cited by
Stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds
Christensen, N. (2019) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aae6b5 · Cited by 316
Search for the isotropic stochastic background using data from Advanced LIGO’s second observing run
Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., Acernese, F., Ackley, K., Adams, C., Adya, V. B., Affeldt, C., Agathos, M., et al. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.100.061101 · Cited by 312
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Romano, J. D., & Cornish, N. J.
- Venue
- Living Reviews in Relativity
- Published
- 2017-04-04
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2-2
- ISSN
- 1433-8351 (ISSN-L)
- 2367-3613
- OpenAlex
- W2514006162
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1
- The paper
- Romano, J. D., & Cornish, N. J. (2017). Detection methods for stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds: a unified treatment. Living Reviews in Relativity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41114-017-0004-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.