The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancements in deep learning for accurate classification of grape leaves and diagnosis of grape diseases
Open accessAbstract
Plant diseases cause significant agricultural losses, demanding accurate detection methods. Traditional approaches relying on expert knowledge may be biased, but advancements in computing, particularly deep learning, offer non-experts effective tools. This study focuses on fine-tuning cutting-edge pre-trained CNN and vision transformer models to classify grape leaves and diagnose grape leaf diseases through digital images. Our research examined a PlantVillage dataset, which comprises 4062 leaf images distributed across four categories. Additionally, we utilized the Grapevine dataset, consisting of 500 leaf images. This dataset is organized into five distinct groups, with each group containing 100 images corresponding to one of the five grape types. The PlantVillage dataset focuses on four classes related to grape diseases, namely Black Rot, Leaf Blight, Healthy, and Esca leaves. On the other hand, the Grapevine dataset includes five classes for leaf recognition, specifically Ak, Alaidris, Buzgulu, Dimnit, and Nazli. In experiments with 14 CNN and 17 vision transformer models, deep learning demonstrated high accuracy in distinguishing grape diseases and recognizing leaves. Notably, four models achieved 100% accuracy on PlantVillage and Grapevine datasets, with Swinv2-Base standing out. This approach holds promise for enhancing crop productivity through early disease detection and providing insights into grape variety characterization in agriculture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutions
Chollet, F. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.195 · Cited by 20,380
Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolution
Liu, Z., Hu, H., Lin, Y., Yao, Z., Xie, Z., Wei, Y., Ning, J., Cao, Y., Zhang, Z., Dong, L., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.09883 · Cited by 2,679
Multiscale vision transformers
Fan, H., Xiong, B., Mangalam, K., Li, Y., Yan, Z., Malik, J., & Feichtenhofer, C. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00675 · Cited by 1,407 · cited 1×
“Multiscale vision transformers (MViT) are transformer structures introduced by Fan et al. (2021) for modeling visual data such as images and videos.”
MobileViT: Light-weight, General-purpose, and Mobile-friendly Vision Transformer
Mehta, S., & Rastegari, M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.02178 · Cited by 1,110
Metadata
- Authors
- Kunduracioglu, I., & Pacal, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection
- Published
- 2024-03-26
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1061-1080
- ISSN
- 1861-3829 (ISSN-L)
- 1861-3837
- OpenAlex
- W4393187924
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 37.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancements in deep learning for accurate classification of grape leaves and diagnosis of grape diseases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s41348-024-00896-z
- The paper
- Kunduracioglu, I., & Pacal, I. (2024). Advancements in deep learning for accurate classification of grape leaves and diagnosis of grape diseases. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-024-00896-z
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.