RETRACTED ARTICLE: Risk Factors of Cyberbullying Perpetration Among School-Aged Children Across 41 Countries: a Perspective of Routine Activity Theory
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parental mediation acts as a protective factor against cyberbullying victimization.
“This parental mediation acts as a protective factor, aligning with the Routine Activity Theory, which emphasizes the role of capable guardians as a protective factor against experiencing deviant acts74–76,153.”
From Umbrella review of meta-analyses on the risk factors, protective factors, consequences and interventions of cyberbullying victimization (2024) · cites this paper as [153]
Cites
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0035618 · Cited by 3,266 · see citing works
Cyberbullying Via Social Media
Whittaker, E., & Kowalski, R. M. (2015) · Journal of School Violence · doi:10.1080/15388220.2014.949377 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Cassidy, W., Faucher, C., & Jackson, M. (2013) · School Psychology International · doi:10.1177/0143034313479697 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Kırcaburun, K., Kokkinos, C. M., Demetrovics, Z., Király, O., Griffiths, M. D., & Çolak, T. S. (2019) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-018-9894-8 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kasturiratna, K. T. A. S., Hartanto, A., Chen, C. H. Y., Tong, E. M. W., & Majeed, N. M. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02011-6 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
- Authors
- Li, Q., Luo, Y., Hao, Z., Smith, B., Guo, Y., & Tyrone, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama (US)
- University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Qingyi
- Venue
- International Journal of Bullying Prevention
- Published
- 2020-06-27
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 168-180
- ISSN
- 2523-3653 (ISSN-L)
- 2523-3661
- OpenAlex
- W3037156791
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Update notices
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Bullying Prevention (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- cyberbullying perpetration, routine activity theory, school-aged children, risk factors, protective factors, family activities, peer activities, solitary activities, cross-cultural comparison, WHO regions, HBSC study
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
