The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market
Open accessAbstract
The Covid-19 pandemic and the social distancing that followed have affected all walks of society, also education. In order to keep education running, educational institutions have had to quickly adapt to the situation. This has resulted in an unprecedented push to online learning. Many, including commercial digital learning platform providers, have rushed to provide their support and ‘solutions’, sometimes for free. The Covid-19 pandemic has therefore also created a sellers’ market in ed-tech. This paper employs a critical lens to reflect on the possible problems arising from hasty adoption of commercial digital learning solutions whose design might not always be driven by best pedagogical practices but their business model that leverages user data for profit-making. Moreover, already before Covid-19, there has been increasing critique of how ed-tech is redefining and reducing concepts of teaching and learning. The paper also challenges the narrative that claims, ‘education is broken, and it should and can be fixed with technology’. Such technologization, often seen as neutral, is closely related to educationalization, i.e. imposing growing societal problems for education to resolve. Therefore, this is a critical moment to reflect how the current choices educational institutions are making might affect with Covid-19 education and online learning: Will they reinforce capitalist instrumental view of education or promote holistic human growth? This paper urges educational leaders to think carefully about the decisions they are currently making and if they indeed pave the way to a desirable future of education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*
Bourdieu, P. (2018) · Food and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315680347-10 · Cited by 20,289
Mills, C. W. (1959) · The Mississippi Valley Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1891592 · Cited by 8,191
The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2024) · Handbook of Research in Online Learning · doi:10.1163/9789004702813_021 · Cited by 6,253
(2019) · Cited by 2,637
Age of Surveillance Capitalism – The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power.
Kendell, D. (2020) · Brock Education Journal · doi:10.26522/brocked.v29i2.849 · Cited by 2,135
Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology
Penny, S., & Postman, N. (1997) · Leonardo · doi:10.2307/1576387 · Cited by 1,302
High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox
Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H., & Peck, C. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038004813 · Cited by 1,232
Floud, J., & Mills, C. W. (1960) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3119547 · Cited by 1,138
Srnicek, N. (2016) · Cited by 1,099
Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2013) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764213479366 · Cited by 1,078
Cited by
Media comparison studies dominate comparative research on augmented reality in education
Buchner, J., & Kerres, M. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104711 · Cited by 133
Learning analytics: state of the art
Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A., & Ramírez Mendoza, R. A. (2022) · International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) · doi:10.1007/s12008-022-00930-0 · Cited by 93
In the nexus of integrity and surveillance: Proctoring (re)considered
Khalil, M., Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2022) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12713 · Cited by 47
Who Wrote This?: Detecting Artificial Intelligence–Generated Text from Human-Written Text
Kumar, R., & Mindzak, M. (2024) · Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity · doi:10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i1.77675 · Cited by 38
Tsai, C.-W., Lin, M. Y.-C., Cheng, Y.-P., Lee, L.-Y., Chyr, W.-L., Lin, C.-H., Lin, J.-W., & Tsai, M.-C. (2023) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104849 · Cited by 25
“To keep education operating, schools and universities have had to adapt to the situation quickly (Teräs et al., 2020).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M.
- Venue
- Postdigital Science and Education
- Published
- 2020-07-13
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 863-878
- ISSN
- 2524-485X (ISSN-L)
- 2524-4868
- OpenAlex
- W3041807988
- Cited by
- 594
- References
- 55
- FWCI
- 104.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
- The paper
- Teräs, M., Suoranta, J., Teräs, H., & Curcher, M. (2020). Post-Covid-19 Education and Education Technology ‘Solutionism’: a Seller’s Market. Postdigital Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00164-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.