Workload Monitoring in Team Sports: Using Elite Cricket as an Example
Open accessAbstract
Workload monitoring is used to assess athlete preparedness to ensure that they are optimally prepared for competition. Although many workload studies have been done, most are delimited to individual sport athletes and endurance athletes. There is also controversy regarding which measures and in what combinations they should be used. There is a paucity of literature on workload monitoring in team sports such as cricket. Cricket is an interesting and complex sport which has dimensions of many other sports (team and individual) and was the focus of this broad, narrative review. The review highlights the unique demands of the sport and why consideration of the sport in question is important. It further identifies that most of the workload research has been done on fast bowlers with debate surrounding optimal workloads. It calls for research in specific areas and importantly on other player positions considering their unique demands and identifies what can be used currently by practitioners in the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Professional cricketers experience high competition demands that differ throughout the season as a result of multiple match formats.
“Professional cricketers experience high competition demands, which differ throughout the season as a result of multiple match formats (multi-day [> 96 overs.day-1] and limited overs [50- and 20-over] cricket) [1–3].”
From Creatine kinase and neuromuscular fatigue responses following differing spells of simulated cricket fast bowling (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Christie, C. J., Barnard, D. V., Pote, L., & Munro, C. E.
- Affiliations
- Rhodes University (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Christie, Candice J.
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
- Published
- 2020-04-03
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-274
- ISSN
- 0019-5413 (ISSN-L)
- 1998-3727
- PMC
- PMC7205960
- OpenAlex
- W3028437541
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Orthopaedics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
- Keywords
- workload monitoring, team sports, crickets, athlete preparedness, fast bowlers, playing position, training load
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review