Development of a Trichoderma–Bacillus biofilm inoculant for plant growth promotion and biocontrol of Sclerotium and Fusarium in chickpea
Open accessAbstract
Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) productivity is significantly hindered by soil-borne pathogens such as Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. ciceri (FOC) and Sclerotium rolfsii (SR), which cause wilt and collar rot, respectively. This study aimed to develop a dual-species biofilm formulation using Trichoderma harzianum as a fungal mycelium matrix and Bacillus subtilis as a bacterial partner, to enhance plant growth and provide biocontrol efficacy under pathogen pressure. Biofilm formation was optimized using six media, with Z-medium yielding the highest biomass (4.62 ± 0.10 g fresh weight; 0.42 ± 0.03 g dry weight). Microscopic analyses, including SEM and CSLM, confirmed robust colonization of fungal hyphae by B. subtilis within the biofilm matrix. The biofilm formulation demonstrated superior plant growth-promoting (PGP) traits such as elevated IAA production (22.14 ± 2.6 µg/mL) and ammonia release compared to monocultures. In vitro antifungal assays showed 60% inhibition of pathogen growth by the biofilm, outperforming individual strains. Pot experiments under net-house conditions revealed significant improvements in shoot and root length and reductions in disease incidence. Notably, treatment T4 (FOC + SR + Biofilm) recorded only 19.4% disease incidence compared to 78.3% in the untreated pathogen control. Furthermore, biofilm-treated plants exhibited markedly higher activities of defense-related enzymes PAL, POX, and PPO indicating induced systemic resistance (ISR). The T. harzianum–B. subtilis biofilm formulation demonstrated synergistic effects in promoting plant growth, suppressing disease, and priming host immunity, suggesting its strong potential for sustainable chickpea cultivation under biotic stress conditions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31
- Authors
- Kashyap, A. S., Kannojia, P., Manzar, N., Srivastava, D., Malaviya, D., Singh, U. B., & Sharma, P. K.
- Affiliations
- Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
- People’s University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Kashyap, Abhijeet Shankar
- Sharma, Pawan K.
- Venue
- Discover Sustainability
- Published
- 2026-01-29
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2662-9984 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7126056703
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Discover Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
- Keywords
- Trichoderma harzianum, Bacillus subtilis, dual-species biofilms, chickpea, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri, Sclerotium rolfsii, plant growth promotion, biological control, induced systemic resistance, indole-3-acetic acid production, antifungal activity, soil-borne pathogens, plant defense enzymes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review