The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anomaly-based intrusion detection system for IoT application
Open accessAbstract
Internet-of-Things (IoT) connects various physical objects through the Internet and it has a wide application, such as in transportation, military, healthcare, agriculture, and many more. Those applications are increasingly popular because they address real-time problems. In contrast, the use of transmission and communication protocols has raised serious security concerns for IoT devices, and traditional methods such as signature and rule-based methods are inefficient for securing these devices. Hence, identifying network traffic behavior and mitigating cyber attacks are important in IoT to provide guaranteed network security. Therefore, we develop an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) based on a deep learning model called Pearson-Correlation Coefficient - Convolutional Neural Networks (PCC-CNN) to detect network anomalies. The PCC-CNN model combines the important features obtained from the linear-based extractions followed by the Convolutional Neural Network. It performs a binary classification for anomaly detection and also a multiclass classification for various types of attacks. The model is evaluated on three publicly available datasets: NSL-KDD, CICIDS-2017, and IOTID20. We first train and test five different (Logistic Regression, Linear Discriminant Analysis, K Nearest Neighbour, Classification and Regression Tree,& Support Vector Machine) PCC-based Machine Learning models to evaluate the model performance. We achieve the best similar accuracy from the KNN and CART model of 98%, 99%, and 98%, respectively, on the three datasets. On the other hand, we achieve a promising performance with a better detection accuracy of 99.89% and with a low misclassification rate of 0.001 with our proposed PCC-CNN model. The integrated model is promising, with a misclassification rate (or False alarm rate) of 0.02, 0.02, and 0.00 with Binary and Multiclass intrusion detection classifiers. Finally, we compare and discuss our PCC-CNN model in comparison to five traditional PCC-ML models. Our proposed Deep Learning (DL)-based IDS outperforms traditional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Toward Generating a New Intrusion Detection Dataset and Intrusion Traffic Characterization
Sharafaldin, I., Habibi Lashkari, A., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems Security and Privacy · doi:10.5220/0006639801080116 · Cited by 5,318 · cited 2×
“It was developed within an emulated environment at the Canadian Institute for Cybersecurity (CIC), University of New Brunswick, Canada [128].”
BackgroundA Survey of Data Mining and Machine Learning Methods for Cyber Security Intrusion Detection
Buczak, A. L., & Guven, E. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2015.2494502 · Cited by 3,332
A Deep Learning Approach for Intrusion Detection Using Recurrent Neural Networks
Yin, C., Zhu, Y., Fei, J., & He, X. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2762418 · Cited by 2,100
Developing Realistic Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attack Dataset and Taxonomy
Sharafaldin, I., Lashkari, A. H., Hakak, S., & Ghorbani, A. A. (2019) · 2019 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology (ICCST) · doi:10.1109/ccst.2019.8888419 · Cited by 1,275
Fadlullah, Z. M., Tang, F., Mao, B., Kato, N., Akashi, O., Inoue, T., & Mizutani, K. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2707140 · Cited by 810
A Review of Machine Learning and IoT in Smart Transportation
Zantalis, F., Koulouras, G., Karabetsos, S., & Kandris, D. (2019) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi11040094 · Cited by 625
Enhanced Network Anomaly Detection Based on Deep Neural Networks
Naseer, S., Saleem, Y., Khalid, S., Bashir, M. K., Han, J., Iqbal, M. M., & Han, K. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2863036 · Cited by 507
A Survey on Various Cyber Attacks and their Classification
(2013) · International journal of network security · doi:10.6633/ijns.201309.15(5).09 · Cited by 177
Future Industry Internet of Things with Zero-trust Security
Li, S., Iqbal, M., & Saxena, N. (2024) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10199-5 · Cited by 128 · cited 1×
“(1234567890 1 3 devices[13–15].”
Cited by
Devi, M., Nandal, P., & Sehrawat, H. (2025) · Intelligent Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200553 · Cited by 27
Ismail, M., Alrabaee, S., Choo, K.-K. R., Ali, L., & Harous, S. (2024) · Mobile Networks and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11036-024-02367-z · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhavsar, M., Roy, K., Kelly, J., & Olusola, O.
- Venue
- Discover Internet of Things
- Published
- 2023-05-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2730-7239 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4381568796
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 20.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anomaly-based intrusion detection system for IoT application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s43926-023-00034-5
- The paper
- Bhavsar, M., Roy, K., Kelly, J., & Olusola, O. (2023). Anomaly-based intrusion detection system for IoT application. Discover Internet of Things. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-023-00034-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.