Cited by 0

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Conflict-aware uncertainty alignment for tool-augmented document-centric multimodal intelligence

Muthusami, Rathinasamy, Saritha, Kandhasamy·2026·Discover Artificial Intelligence

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44163-026-02409-3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. Guo Z, Cheng S, Niu Y, Wang H, Zhou S, Huang W, et al. StableToolBench-MirrorAPI: modeling tool environments as mirrors of 7,000+ real-world APIs. In: Findings of ACL; 2025. p. 5247–5270. · DOI
  2. Xu H, Wang Z, Zhu Z, Pan L, Chen X, Fan S, et al. Alignment for efficient tool calling of large language models. In: EMNLP; 2025. p. 17787–17803. · DOI
  3. Wang H, Huang Y, Huang H, Wang Y, Li J, Gui G. Uncertainty-aware dynamic fusion network. Inf Fusion. 2025;123:103249. · DOI
  4. Zhang K, Xu W, Miao Z, Tian Y, Cen Y, Liu Y, et al. Causal learning with uncertainty-aware transformer. Neurocomputing. 2026;665:132196. · DOI
  5. Ye J, Li S, Li G, Huang C, Gao S, Wu Y, et al. Toolsword: safety issues of LLM tool learning. In: ACL; 2024. p. 2181–2211. · DOI
  6. Guan S, Wang J, Bian J, Zhu B, Lou JG, Xiong H. Evaluating LLM-based agents for multi-turn conversations: a survey. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol. 2026;17(4):1–40. · DOI
  7. Carraro D, Bridge D. Recommendation diversity with LLMs. ACM Trans Recomm Syst. 2025;4(2):1–40. · DOI
  8. Spanos D, Passalis N, Tefas A. Improving uncertainty estimation in DNNs. Pattern Recognit. 2025;112267. · DOI
  9. Han Y, Liu Z, Yuan Z, Pu Y, Wang C, Song S, et al. Latency-aware unified networks. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2024;46(12):7760–74. · DOI
  10. Hamdi A, Pontes EL, Sidere N, Coustaty M, Doucet A. Impact of OCR errors on NER. Nat Lang Eng. 2023;29(2):425–48. · DOI
  11. Hemmer A, Coustaty M, Bartolo N, Ogier JM. Confidence-aware document OCR error detection. In: Document analysis systems; Springer; 2024. p. 213–228. · DOI
  12. Catak FO, Kuzlu M. Uncertainty quantification in large language models through convex hull analysis. Discov Artif Intell. 2024;4:90. · DOI
  13. Wang P, Wu Q, Shen C, Dick A, Van Den Hengel A. FVQA. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017;40(10):2413–27. · DOI
  14. Wang Y, Lin Q, Shi J, An Y, Liu J, Wei B, et al. Explainable VQA survey. Inf Fusion. 2026;132:104215. · DOI
  15. Zhao Y, Tao Q, Sun P, Huang J, Song W, Hu N. HPRNet for image captioning. Pattern Recognit. 2026;177:113249. · DOI
  16. Khan MZ, Nguyen DT, Nguyen TT, et al. Cross-attention for VQA. Multimed Tools Appl. 2025;84(15):47543–65. · DOI
  17. Huang H, Qin Q. Cross-modal representation for retrieval. Multimed Syst. 2025;31(6):331. · DOI
  18. Naeem MF, Xian Y, Zhai X, Hoyer L, Van Gool L, Tombari F. SILC vision-language pretraining. In: ECCV; Springer; 2025.
  19. Ma X, Xie H, Qin SJ. Integrating LLMs with visual perception. Inf Fusion. 2026;125:103419. · DOI
  20. Ashqar HI, Jaber A, Alhadidi TI, Elhenawy M. Multimodal LLMs for transportation detection. Computation. 2025;13(6):133. · DOI
  21. Zhang Y, Wang M, Li X, Ren K, Zhu C, Naseem U. TurnBench-MS. In: Findings of EMNLP; 2025. p. 19892–19924. · DOI
  22. Prasad A, Koller A, Hartmann M, Clark P, Sabharwal A, Bansal M, et al. ADAPT planning with LLMs. In: NAACL; 2024. p. 4226–4252. · DOI
  23. Qu C, Dai S, Wei X, et al. Tool learning survey. Front Comput Sci. 2025;19:198343. · DOI
  24. Ye J, Li G, Gao S, Huang C, Wu Y, Li S, et al. ToolEyes evaluation. In: COLING; 2025. p. 156–187.
  25. Pandit T, Mahendru S, Raval M, Upadhyay D. Evolution of reranking models. In: ICCLNP; Springer; 2025. p. 56–67. · DOI
  26. He W, Jiang Z, Xiao T, Xu Z, Li Y. Uncertainty quantification survey. ACM Comput Surv. 2025.
  27. Fang G, Ma X, Mi MB, Wang X. Isomorphic pruning. In: ECCV; Springer; 2024. p. 232–250. · DOI
  28. Chen M, Wei G, Yuan S, et al. Plasmonic neural device. Sci China Mater. 2025;68:3703–14. · DOI
  29. Ramesh G, Sahil M, Palan SA. Zero-shot and few-shot NLP review. Discov Appl Sci. 2025;7:966. · DOI
  30. Muthusami R, Saritha K. Adaptive mixture-of-recursions vision transformer with joint depth routing for multimedia vision. Multimed Tools Appl. 2026;85:675. · DOI
  31. Huang J, Zhang J, Jiang K, et al. Visual instruction tuning survey. Int J Comput Vis. 2025;133:8151–89. · DOI
  32. Hamid OH. There is more to AI than meets the eye: aligning man-made algorithms with nature-inspired mechanisms. In: IEEE/ACS International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications; IEEE; 2022. p. 1–4. · DOI
  33. Hamid OH. Data-centric and model-centric AI: twin drivers of compact and robust Industry 4.0 solutions. Appl Sci. 2023;13(5):2753. · DOI
  34. Hamid OH. ChatGPT and the Chinese room argument: an eloquent AI conversationalist lacking true understanding and consciousness. In: IEEE international conference on information technology trends; IEEE; 2023. p. 238–241. · DOI
  35. Ma Z, Liu J, Luo X, Huang Z, Zhu Q, Che W. Meta-verification for tool-augmented LLMs. In: KDD; 2025. p. 2078–2089. · DOI
  36. Franchi G, Laurent O, Leguéry M, Bursuc A, Pilzer A, Yao A. Bayesian uncertainty estimation. In: CVPR; 2024. p. 12194–12204. · DOI
  37. Detommaso G, Gasparin A, Donini M, Seeger M, Wilson AG, Archambeau C. Fortuna UQ library. J Mach Learn Res. 2024;25:1–7.
  38. Huang S, Zhong W, Lu J, Zhu Q, Gao J, Liu W, et al. Benchmarking tool utilization. In: Findings of ACL; 2024. p. 4363–4400. · DOI
  39. Teney D, Nicolicioiu AM, Hartmann V, Abbasnejad E. Neural redshift. In: CVPR; 2024. p. 4786–4796. · DOI
  40. Li C, Xu H, Tian J, Wang W, Yan M, Bi B, et al. mPLUG vision-language learning. In: EMNLP; 2022. p. 7241–7259. · DOI
  41. Wang W, et al. InternVL. In: Large Vision-Language Models; Springer; 2026. · DOI
  42. Joshi K, Arolkar H. Tesseract OCR review for Indian languages. In: Cognitive computing and cyber physical systems; Springer; 2025.
  43. Ma W, Cao M, Ma J, Dong Z, Yang C, Li Z. Mamba-YOLO for document layout. Pattern Recognit. 2026;170:112031. · DOI
  44. Yang L, Yang Z, Li F, et al. Single-layer feedforward networks with dynamic width. Sci China Inf Sci. 2025;68:182205. · DOI
  45. Cai R, Huang S, Qiao J, et al. Online causal reinforcement learning framework. Sci China Inf Sci. 2026;69:122104. · DOI
  46. Su M, Yuan Q, Qu P, et al. Dual-arm cooperative control using PPO. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2026;38:45. · DOI
  47. Liu C, Li S, Xu M, Maimaiti M, Silamu W. Scene text recognition via dual decoder. In: PRCV; Springer; 2026.
  48. Mathew M, Karatzas D, Jawahar CV. DocVQA dataset. In: WACV; 2021. p. 2200–2209.
  49. Jaume G, Ekenel HK, Thiran JP. FUNSD dataset. arXiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.13538 · DOI
  50. Huang Z, Chen Y, Yu H. SROIE competition. In: ICDAR; IEEE; 2019. p. 1488–1493.
  51. Zhong X, Tang J, Yepes AJ. PubLayNet dataset. In: ICDAR; IEEE; 2019. p. 1015–1022. · DOI
  52. Chen S, Yuan J, Zhang Y, et al. Domain adversarial learning. Front Comput Sci. 2025;19:1912378. · DOI
  53. Wang Y, Deng Y, Zheng Y, Chattopadhyay P, Wang L. Vision transformer survey. Technologies. 2025;13(1):32. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Muthusami, R., & Saritha, K.
Venue
Discover Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-10-05
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2731-0809
Cited by
0
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review