CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Build rapport and collect data: A teaching resource on the clinical interviewing intake

Open access
Pashak, Travis J., Heron, Michael R.·2022·Discover Psychology
DOI 10.1007/s44202-022-00019-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper is an overview of the intake process for mental health helping professions. We intend for this piece to serve as a teaching resource, useful as an intake primer for novice clinicians in psychology, social work, counseling, or psychiatry, but perhaps also as a helpful review for experienced clinicians as well. We define and describe the clinical interviewing intake, discuss its history, and conceptualize it as an endeavor toward building rapport and collecting data. Specific topics we explore include: adopting an appropriate clinical attitude, engaging in cultural humility, considering practical factors about conducting the intake, viewing interviewing as an art, evaluating tools of data collection, discussing psychometric considerations in intakes (e.g., reliability, validity, standardization, and sources of data), and identifying topics to assess in-session and how to explore them. The paper closes with some summary thoughts and overall advice to those soon to embark on their first clinical interviewing intake.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44202-022-00019-5

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Brief symptom inventory (BSI): Administration, scoring, and procedures manual. National Computer Systems.
  2. Kottler, J. A. (2010). On being a therapist (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
  3. Morrison, J. (2008). The first interview (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
  4. Sonne, J. L. (2012). PsycEssentials: A pocket resource for mental health practitioners. American Psychological Association.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Pashak, T. J., & Heron, M. R.
Affiliations
Saginaw Valley State University (US)
Corresponding author
Pashak, Travis J.
ORCID
Pashak, Travis J.
Venue
Discover Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-03-10
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2731-4537 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/s44202-022-00019-5
OpenAlex
W4220876137
Cited by
17
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
Discover Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
clinical interview, intake process, rapport building, data collection, clinical attitudes, cultural humility, reliability and validity, standardization, novice clinicians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review