Cited by 0Cinema History and CriticismNarrative Theory and AnalysisEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

Expanded Subjectivity as Cinema’s Self-Reflection: Affective Images in Nicolas Roeg’s Don’t Look Now

Open access
Csönge, Tamás·2025·Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies

Abstract

Nicolas Roeg’s Don’t Look Now (1973) – a psychological thriller – in terms of its narrative is a drama of loss, grief and acceptance, but it is also a highly reflexive film because it takes perception and interpretation as its central themes. The article discusses the curious relationship between the film’s diegetic reality and the cinematic apparatus that represents this reality. At the heart of the matter lies the issue of expressing and extending subjectivity through an (audio) visual medium, the representation of thought processes as mental and technological reconstructions of personal experiences, perceptions and feelings. The initial and central trope in question is the cinematic form and formation of memory, or more precisely a temporally expanded sense of memory: visions of the past, the future, and the present. I argue that the protagonist’s ability to unwittingly see beyond the here and now is not only a reflection of trauma processing, but also analogous to the mental processes of the spectator, his or her successful or failed understanding of the film’s complex stream of images. I try to show that cinema – by exploiting the potential of the conventions of continuity editing – is capable of employing traits of subjectivity without creating a unified fictional narrator character or making perceptual focalization as an explanation for the ambiguous meanings of representation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s44428-025-00002-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Csönge, T.
Affiliations
University of Pecs (HU)
Corresponding author
Csönge, Tamás
Venue
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies
Published
2025-08-19
Volume
27
Issue
1
ISSN
  • 2065-5924 (ISSN-L)
  • 2066-7779
OpenAlex
W4413312095
Cited by
0
References
1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Film and Media Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of Pécs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
Nicolas Roeg, Don't Look Now, subjectivity, reflexivity, memory, affect, trauma, perception, spectatorship, continuity editing, narrative time, psychological thriller

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review