The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using Sternberg's additive factor method, Sanders showed that the processing stages at level 1, as well as the energetic levels 2 and 3, could be separately influenced by task manipulations.
“Using Sternberg's additive factor method (1969), Sanders showed that the processing stages at level 1, as well as the energetic levels 2 and 3 could be separately influenced by what he called 'task manipulations'.”
From Context-dependent Dynamic Processes in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Differentiating Common and Unique Effects of State Regulation Deficits and Delay Aversion (2010) · cites this paper as Sternberg, 1969
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 3,137
- Authors
- Sternberg, S.
- Corresponding author
- Sternberg, Saul
- ORCID
- Sternberg, Saul
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1969
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 276-315
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1967670055
- Cited by
- 3,137
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 58
- FWCI
- 19.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Keywords
- reaction time, stage duration, statistical independence, binary classification, identification, cognitive processes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
