The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Towards a model of stress and human performance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sleep loss may cause malfunctioning of arousal and activation. If this malfunctioning is not corrected by effort, there is a decrement in the performance.
“Sleep loss may cause malfunctioning of arousal and activation. If this malfunctioning is not corrected by effort, there is a decrement in the performance (Sanders, 1983).”
From The Analysis of Occurrences Associated with Air Traffic Volume and Air Traffic Controllers’ Alertness for Fatigue Risk Management (2021) · cites this paper as Sanders, 1983
Generally, reaction time variability decreases during faster event rates for all children.
“Generally, RTV decreases during faster ERs for all children [41,83,84].”
From Reaction Time Variability in ADHD: A Review (2012) · cites this paper as [84]
The effort system is under the control of an evaluation mechanism that scans the momentary state of the arousal and activation levels.
“The effort system is under control of an evaluation mechanism (with many features in common with executive control systems in other models), which scans the momentary state of the arousal and activation levels.”
From Context-dependent Dynamic Processes in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Differentiating Common and Unique Effects of State Regulation Deficits and Delay Aversion (2010) · cites this paper as Sanders, 1983
When task duration is short and subjects are motivated, stimulus degradation, set-size, and response compatibility manipulations affect the stimulus encoding, central processes, and motor preparation stages in predictably different ways.
“For instance, when the task duration is short and when subjects are motivated, stimulus degradation, set-size, and response compatibility manipulations affect the stimulus encoding, central processes and motor preparation stages in predictably different ways.”
From Context-dependent Dynamic Processes in Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Differentiating Common and Unique Effects of State Regulation Deficits and Delay Aversion (2010) · cites this paper as Sanders, 1983
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 98 · Cited by 878
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Nääätänen, 1973, The inverted-U relationship between activation and performance: a critical review, 4
- Sperandio, 1972, Charge de travail et regulation des processes opératoires, Travail Humaine, 35, 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanders, A. F.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Sanders, A.F.
- Venue
- Acta Psychologica
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-97
- ISSN
- 0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081906223
- Cited by
- 878
- References
- 98
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 72.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- stress, human performance, information processing, arousal, resource model, performance models
- MeSH terms
- Arousal, Attention, Brain, Cognition, Humans, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review