CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21Mind wandering and attentionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extraversion and levels of control of sustained attention

Matthews, Gerald·1989·Acta Psychologica
DOI 10.1016/0001-6918(89)90016-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0001-6918(89)90016-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Matthews and his colleagues found little support for the connection between arousal, extraversion, and performance on cognitive ability tests as described by Eysenck (1967) or the Yerkes-Dodson law, and suggested that the association between extraversion and ability is complex, involving many interactions.

    “Matthews and his colleagues (Matthews, 1985, 1987, 1989; Matthews, Davies, & Holley, 1990; Matthews, Davies, & Lees, 1990; Matthews, Jones, & Chamberlain, 1989) found little support for the connection between arousal, extraversion, and performance on cognitive ability tests as described by Eysenck (1967) or the Yerkes-Dodson law, and suggested that the association between extraversion and ability”

    From Extraversion and intelligence: A meta-analytic investigation (2005) · cites this paper as Matthews, 1989

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Broadbent, 1977, Levels, hierarchies and the locus of control, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 181, 10.1080/14640747708400596 · DOI
  2. Broadbent, 1982, The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire and its correlates, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1, 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x · DOI
  3. Craig, 1985, Speed-accuracy trade-off and time of day, Acta Psychologica, 58, 115, 10.1016/0001-6918(85)90002-2 · DOI
  4. Davies, 1966, The effects of noise and doubling the signal frequency on individual differences in visual vigilance performance, British Journal of Psychology, 57, 381, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1966.tb01039.x · DOI
  5. Fisk, 1987, Automatic and controlled processing approach to interpreting vigilance performance: A review and reevaluation, Human Factors, 29, 653, 10.1177/001872088702900605 · DOI
  6. Horne, 1976, A self-assessment questionnaire to determine Morningness-Eveningness in human circadian rhythms, International Journal of Chronobiology, 4, 179
  7. Humphreys, 1984, Personality, motivation and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing, Psychological Review, 91, 153, 10.1037/0033-295X.91.2.153 · DOI
  8. Jones, 1983, Time of day and performance: A levels of control approach
  9. Matthews, 1985, The effects of extraversion and arousal on intelligence test performance, British Journal of Psychology, 76, 479, 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1985.tb01971.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Matthews, 1986, The interactive effects of extraversion and arousal on performance: Are creativity tests anomalous?, Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 751, 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90073-5 · DOI
  11. Matthews, 1987, Personality and multidimensional arousal: A study of two dimensions of extraversion, Personality and Individual Differences, 8, 9, 10.1016/0191-8869(87)90005-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Matthews, 1988, Refining the measurement of mood: The UWIST Mood Adjective Checklist
  13. Norman, 1985, Attention to action: willed and automatic control of behaviour, Vol. 4
  14. Paap, 1981, Letter encoding is an obligatory but capacity-demanding operation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 518
  15. Parasuraman, 1976, Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 578
  16. Schneider, 1984, Automatic category search and its transfer, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 1
  17. Shiffrin, 1977, Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory, Psychological Review, 84, 127, 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.127 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Thayer, 1978, Toward a psychological theory of multidimensional activation (arousal), Motivation and Emotion, 2, 1, 10.1007/BF00992729 · DOI
  19. Thayer, 1986, Activation-Deactivation Checklist: Current overview and structural analysis, Psychological Reports, 58, 607, 10.2466/pr0.1986.58.2.607 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Matthews, G.
Affiliations
Aston University (GB)
Corresponding author
Matthews, Gerald
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-03
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
129-146
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0001-6918(89)90016-4
OpenAlex
W1981850218
Cited by
21
References
1
Citations by year
2013: 1
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
extraversion, sustained attention, levels of control, time of day, executive function, automatic processes, speed-accuracy trade-off, detection efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review