Cited by 378Eating Disorders and BehaviorsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

Weight-related attitudes and behaviors of black women

Kumanyika, Shiriki, Wilson, Judy F, Guilford-Davenport, Marsha·1993·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Weight-related attitudes and practices of women who attended health department clinics or who worked for a health and human services agency were assessed by means of an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire. Black women who were 25 to 64 years old and were not pregnant or had not given birth within the past year were included in this analysis (n = 500). The overweight women perceived themselves as being overweight. They were less likely to be satisfied with their weight and more likely to have dieted and to be currently dieting than nonoverweight women. Awareness of obesity-related health risks was high, but the perceived psychosocial consequences of being overweight were somewhat limited. Approximately 40% of moderately and severely overweight women considered their figures to be attractive or very attractive, which indicates a relatively positive body image. The overweight women were less likely to exercise, less likely to skip meals, and more likely to eat between meals than the nonoverweight women. Among the subset who had ever attempted to lose weight (n = 368), the overweight women were significantly more likely to have regained all or more of the weight lost during their most recent attempt. The findings of this exploratory survey suggest that although overweight black women are weight conscious, the absence of strong negative social pressure combined with a relatively positive body image may limit the extent to which weight loss efforts are sustained. Findings about eating and exercise patterns suggest some specific factors that may interfere with the effectiveness of weight control among black women.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-8223(93)92287-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 378

Authors
Kumanyika, S., Wilson, J. F., & Guilford-Davenport, M.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • National Center for Health Statistics (US)
Corresponding author
Kumanyika, Shiriki
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-04
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
416-422
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009969000
Cited by
378
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
17.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (2s07rr005445-30)
  • National Center for Research Resources (S07RR05445)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
Black women, overweight, obesity, body image, weight management, dieting, weight regain, physical activity, dietary habits, social pressure
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Black or African American, Body Image, Body Weight, Eating, Educational Status, Family, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Middle Aged, Obesity, Obesity, Morbid, Parity, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Behavior, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review