The Effect of Background Noise on Cardiac Auscultation
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Difficulty hearing heart murmurs through a stethoscope can result in missing important information or challenges gathering it.
“When clinicians have difficulty hearing heart murmurs through the stethoscope, it can result in missing important information or encountering challenges in gathering it [300].”
From Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors (2026) · cites this paper as [300]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward Safer Diagnoses: A SEIPS-Based Narrative Review of Diagnostic Errors
Yen, C., Epling, J. W., Rockwell, M., & Vaughn-Cooke, M. (2026) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics16020347 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Groom, D.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Corresponding author
- Groom, Dale
- Venue
- American Heart Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1956-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 781-790
- ISSN
- 0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088494996
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 8.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Phonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Noise Effects and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control
- Keywords
- background noise, cardiac auscultation, heart murmurs, noise masking, stethoscope, hospital wards, noise level
- MeSH terms
- Heart, Heart Murmurs, Heart Sounds, Humans, Noise
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
