Cited by 85Coffee research and impactsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Age and prior caffeine use alter the cardiovascular and adrenomedullary responses to oral caffeine

Izzo, Joseph L., Ghosal, Amitava, Kwong, Tai, Freeman, Richard B., Jaenike, John R.·1983·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

The effects of age and chronic caffeine use (approximately 300 mg/day) on the cardiovascular and humoral responses to 250 mg of oral caffeine (the equivalent of 2 to 3 cups of coffee) were examined. Older subjects had greater increases in blood pressure than younger subjects (p less than 0.03), and caffeine nonusers had greater blood pressure increases than caffeine users, regardless of age (p less than 0.05). Caffeine increased the product of systolic blood pressure and heart rate (an estimate of myocardial oxygen demand) in older caffeine nonusers, but this effect was absent in older caffeine users (p less than 0.01). Cardiovascular effects of caffeine could not be related temporally to changes in plasma epinephrine, which were greater in caffeine nonusers and younger subjects, or to plasma norepinephrine, renin activity or vasopressin, which did not change. Thus, age accentuates and moderate prior caffeine use attenuates the cardiovascular effects of oral caffeine; these effects are not mediated solely through the sympathoadrenal system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(83)90413-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Earlier studies claiming tolerance to pressor effects of caffeine did not mirror normal staggered caffeine consumption.

    “Earlier studies which claimed to show tolerance to the pressor effects of caffeine [11,[16][17][18] have not mirrored 'normal' staggered caffeine consumption but are characterized by a prior period of prolonged abstinence followed by a high dose of caffeine administered once or twice daily.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 85

Authors
Izzo, J. L., Ghosal, A., Kwong, T., Freeman, R. B., & Jaenike, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Izzo, Joseph L.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-10
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
769-773
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966905192
Cited by
85
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
caffeine, age, blood pressure, heart rate, myocardial oxygen demand, plasma epinephrine, plasma norepinephrine, renin activity, vasopressin, sympathoadrenal system
MeSH terms
Adrenal Medulla, Adult, Age Factors, Blood Pressure, Caffeine, Catecholamines, Double-Blind Method, Heart Rate, Humans, Middle Aged, Renin, Vasopressins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review