Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for syncope of unknown origin
Abstract
Long-term prognosis was determined in 70 patients with unexplained syncope who underwent electrophysiologic testing between April 1981 and April 1986. The electrophysiologic study had positive results in 37 patients--31 with ventricular tachycardia, 3 with supraventricular tachycardia and 3 with abnormal conduction. There was no significant difference in the 3-year actuarial recurrence rate between the positive and negative outcomes (32 vs 24%, respectively). At 3 years, patients with positive outcomes had higher rates of sudden death than patients with negative results (48 vs 9%, respectively, p less than 0.002). The 3-year total mortality rate was also markedly higher in patients with positive results than among those with negative outcomes (61 vs 15%, respectively, p less than 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed mortality to be independently associated with unsustained ventricular tachycardia on prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring. It was concluded that patients with electrophysiologically positive results had high rates of sudden death and total mortality that have not been previously well recognized.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of EPS in patients with syncope suspected to be due to VA and acquired nonischemic heart disease is unproven.
“The role of EPS in patients with syncope suspected to be due to VA and acquired nonischemic heart disease is unproven (193–198).”
From 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope (2017) · cites this paper as [197]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Bass, E. B., Elson, J. J., Fogoros, R. N., Peterson, J., Arena, V. C., & Kapoor, W. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kapoor, Wishwa N.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1988-12
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1186-1191
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029508179
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01hl036735-02)
- U.S. Public Health Service (1K04L 01899-01A1)
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1 R01 HL36735-01A1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
- Keywords
- syncope of unknown origin, electrophysiologic testing, long-term prognosis, sudden death, mortality, ventricular tachycardia, syncope recurrence, supraventricular tachycardia
- MeSH terms
- Bundle-Branch Block, Death, Sudden, Electrophysiology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Recurrence, Syncope, Tachycardia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review