Cited by 103Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies for syncope of unknown origin

Bass, Eric B., Elson, James J., Fogoros, Richard N., Peterson, Jacqueline, Arena, Vincent C., Kapoor, Wishwa N.·1988·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Long-term prognosis was determined in 70 patients with unexplained syncope who underwent electrophysiologic testing between April 1981 and April 1986. The electrophysiologic study had positive results in 37 patients--31 with ventricular tachycardia, 3 with supraventricular tachycardia and 3 with abnormal conduction. There was no significant difference in the 3-year actuarial recurrence rate between the positive and negative outcomes (32 vs 24%, respectively). At 3 years, patients with positive outcomes had higher rates of sudden death than patients with negative results (48 vs 9%, respectively, p less than 0.002). The 3-year total mortality rate was also markedly higher in patients with positive results than among those with negative outcomes (61 vs 15%, respectively, p less than 0.001). Multivariate analyses showed mortality to be independently associated with unsustained ventricular tachycardia on prolonged electrocardiographic monitoring. It was concluded that patients with electrophysiologically positive results had high rates of sudden death and total mortality that have not been previously well recognized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9149(88)90257-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 26 · Cited by 103

Authors
Bass, E. B., Elson, J. J., Fogoros, R. N., Peterson, J., Arena, V. C., & Kapoor, W. N.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Kapoor, Wishwa N.
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-12
Volume
62
Issue
17
Pages
1186-1191
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029508179
Cited by
103
References
26
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl036735-02)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (1K04L 01899-01A1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1 R01 HL36735-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Keywords
syncope of unknown origin, electrophysiologic testing, long-term prognosis, sudden death, mortality, ventricular tachycardia, syncope recurrence, supraventricular tachycardia
MeSH terms
Bundle-Branch Block, Death, Sudden, Electrophysiology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Recurrence, Syncope, Tachycardia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review