Maxepa versus bezafibrate in hyperlipidemic cardiac transplant recipients
Abstract
Accelerated coronary artery disease is the most serious obstacle to long-term survival in cardiac transplant recipients. Lipid abnormalities are found frequently in these patients, and there is growing evidence that even minimally increased levels of cholesterol and triglycerides contribute to the development of accelerated coronary artery disease. However, the optimal lipid-lowering therapy after cardiac transplantation has not been defined. In an open, randomized study, the efficacy and safety of bezafibrate (400 mg/day) and fish oil (Maxepa) (10 g/day) for 3 months were compared in 87 cardiac transplant recipients with serum total cholesterol > 6.5 or triglycerides > 2.8 mmol/liter, or both. After 1 month, bezafibrate reduced total cholesterol by 13%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 20% and apolipoprotein B by 13%. It also increased apolipoprotein A1 and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 12 and 20%, respectively, and significantly reduced fibrinogen at 3 months. Maxepa had no significant effect on these variables, but was as effective as bezafibrate in reducing triglycerides (36 and 31%, respectively). Both drugs increased lipoprotein (a) to a similar extent, and bezafibrate significantly increased serum creatinine. These results suggest that bezafibrate has better lipid-, apolipoprotein- and hemostatic modifying properties than does Maxepa, but its potentially adverse effect on renal function needs further investigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Overall, 4 trials had a Jadad score of 4, 1 scored 3, 2 scored 2, and 1 scored 1.
“Overall, 4 trials had a Jadad score of 4 (24,25,32,35), 1 scored 3 (33), 2 scored 2 (29,31), and 1 scored 1 (30).”
From Effects of Fibrates in Kidney Disease (2012) · cites this paper as [29]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 26 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Barbir, M., Hunt, B., Kushwaha, S., Kehely, A., Prescot, R., Thompson, G. R., Mitchell, A., & Yacoub, M.
- Affiliations
- Hammersmith Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Yacoub, Magdi
- Venue
- The American Journal of Cardiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 1596-1601
- ISSN
- 0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025102155
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Keywords
- bezafibrate, fish oil, heart transplant recipients, hyperlipidemia, lipid-lowering therapy, triglycerides, cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, fibrinogen, lipoprotein(a), serum creatinine, renal function
- MeSH terms
- Apolipoproteins B, Bezafibrate, Cholesterol, Docosahexaenoic Acids, Drug Combinations, Female, Fish Oils, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Male, Time Factors, Triglycerides, Eicosapentaenoic Acid, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Heart Transplantation, Apolipoprotein A-I, Lipoprotein(a)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review