Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 278

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis

Open access
Appel, Gerald B., Cohen, David J., Pirani, Conrad L., Meltzer, Jay I., Estes, Dorothy·1987·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The long-term course of 56 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus who had precisely defined renal histology and carefully assessed clinical status at the time of their initial renal biopsy prior to 1976 was evaluated and analyzed by life-table analysis. The average length of follow-up has now been greater than 10 years since initial biopsy. Patients with mesangial lesions (World Health Organization [WHO] classes IIA and IIB) had a more favorable renal and patient survival at five and 10 years than did patients in the other WHO classes (III, IV, and V). Individual renal histologic features of activity and chronicity when combined into an activity index and a chronicity index did not significantly predict renal survival in this population, nor did the presence of hypertension or renal dysfunction at the time of the initial renal biopsy significantly influence renal or patient survival. Patients with the nephrotic syndrome at initial biopsy had a poorer renal survival than did patients without the nephrotic syndrome. However, patients who experienced a remission of the nephrotic syndrome fared better in terms of both renal and patient survival than did those patients without a remission. By life-table analysis, patient survival was significantly better for patients in whom biopsy was performed after 1973 than for those in whom biopsy was performed prior to that time despite similar clinical features and WHO histology in each group interval. Our data suggest that improved survival for patients in recent studies may relate to better supportive care and more selective use of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with milder forms of lupus nephritis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90645-0

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 278

Metadata

Authors
Appel, G. B., Cohen, D. J., Pirani, C. L., Meltzer, J. I., & Estes, D.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-11
Volume
83
Issue
5
Pages
877-885
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1491038651
Cited by
278
References
12
FWCI
2.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90645-0
The paper
Appel, G. B., Cohen, D. J., Pirani, C. L., Meltzer, J. I., & Estes, D. (1987). Long-term follow-up of patients with lupus nephritis. The American Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(87)90645-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.