Economic impact of inappropriate blood transfusions in coronary artery bypass graft surgery
Abstract
Purpose In addition to historically important issues of blood inventory and blood safety, the costs of blood transfusion are anticipated to have an increasingly important impact on transfusion practices. To address this, we analyzed costs of blood support given to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, along with costs of blood components whose transfusions were identified to be unnecessary. Patients and methods Blood components transfused as part of a previously reported national, multicenter audit of 30 adult patients each at 18 institutions undergoing primary, elective CABG surgery were reviewed. Results The range of blood purchase costs among institutions was broad, varying over two-fold. The range of red cell units transfused varied over 10-fold, and the range of total components transfused varied over 40-fold. The number of blood components transfused unnecessarily represented 27% of all blood units transfused, ranging from 7% to 43% among institutions. Inappropriate transfusions accounted for 47%, 32%, and 15% of all platelet, plasma, and red cell units transfused. The mean institutional cost for all blood components transfused per patient was $397 +/- $244. The cost per patient of components transfused inappropriately was 24% of this, or $96 +/- $89 (mean +/- SD). Conclusion These costs could be reduced with practice guidelines and quality improvement programs aimed at reducing the number of inappropriate transfusions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In complex cardiac surgery, more than 20% of blood transfusions-specifically 15% of packed erythrocytes, 32% of fresh frozen plasma, and up to 47% of platelet concentrate transfusions-have been considered inappropriate.
“In complex cardiac surgery, more than 20% of blood transfusions (and more specifically 15% of packed erythrocytes, 32% of FFP, and up to 47% of PC transfusions) have been considered inappropriate.26”
From Point-of-Care Testing: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Efficacy in Coagulopathic Cardiac Surgery Patients (2012) · cites this paper as [26]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 129
- Authors
- Goodnough, L. T., Soegiarso, R. W., Birkmeyer, J. D., & Welch, H. G.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Goodnough, Lawrence Tim
- Venue
- The American Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1993-05
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509-514
- ISSN
- 0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990587076
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 5.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (K07-06125)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
- Keywords
- coronary artery bypass grafting, red blood cell transfusion, platelet transfusion, plasma transfusion, transfusion costs, quality improvement, clinical guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Coronary Artery Bypass, Costs and Cost Analysis, Health Services Misuse, Hospitalization, Humans, United States, Blood Component Transfusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review