The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beta blockade during and after myocardial infarction: An overview of the randomized trials
Yusuf, S., Peto, R., Lewis, J., Collins, R., & Sleight, P. (1985) · Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases · doi:10.1016/s0033-0620(85)80003-7 · Cited by 3,205
A New Design for Randomized Clinical Trials
Zelen, M. (1979) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197905313002203 · Cited by 1,055
A controlled trial of the differential effects of intrapartum fetal monitoring
Haverkamp, A. D., Orleans, M., Langendoerfer, S., McFee, J., Murphy, J., & Thompson, H. E. (1979) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(16)33082-4 · Cited by 392
MONITORING PERINATAL MORTALITY
Wigglesworth, J. S. (1980) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(80)92717-8 · Cited by 364
The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy
Haverkamp, A. D., Thompson, H. E., McFee, J. G., & Cetrulo, C. (1976) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(76)90565-2 · Cited by 324
Peterslund, N. A., Seyer‐Hansen, K., Ipsen, J., Esmann, V., Schønheyder, H. C., & Juhl, H. (1981) · The Lancet · Cited by 310
(1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.3.5879.539-a · Cited by 238
Controlled trial of fetal intensive care
Renou, P., Chang, A., Anderson, I., & Wood, C. (1976) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(76)90641-4 · Cited by 202
Neonatal Signs as Predictors of Cerebral Palsy
Nelson, K. B., & Ellenberg, J. H. (1979) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.64.2.225 · Cited by 201
Statistics: The Problem of Examining Accumulating Data More Than Once
McPherson, K. (1974) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197402282900907 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Meta-analysis: Potentials and promise
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7119.1371 · Cited by 646
Uncertain Value of Electronic Fetal Monitoring in Predicting Cerebral Palsy
Nelson, K. B., Dambrosia, J. M., Ting, T. Y., & Grether, J. K. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199603073341001 · Cited by 532
Murphy, D. J., Johnson, A. M., Sellers, S., & MacKenzie, I. Z. (1995) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92471-x · Cited by 498
A short history of evidence-based obstetric care
Forrester King, J. (2005) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.09.003 · Cited by 398
Garite, T. J., Dildy, G. A., McNamara, H., Nageotte, M. P., Boehm, F. H., Dellinger, E. H., Knuppel, R. A., Porreco, R. P., Miller, H. S., Sunderji, S., et al. (2000) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2000.110632 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- MacDonald, D., Grant, A., Sheridan-Pereira, M., Boylan, P., & Chalmers, I.
- Venue
- American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1985-07
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 524-539
- ISSN
- 0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049613783
- Cited by
- 631
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 33.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90619-2
- The paper
- MacDonald, D., Grant, A., Sheridan-Pereira, M., Boylan, P., & Chalmers, I. (1985). The Dublin randomized controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(85)90619-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
