Cited by 794Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

The association between prenatal stress and infant birth weight and gestational age at birth: a prospective investigation

Open access
Wadhwa, Pathik D., Sandman, Curt A., Porto, Manuel, Dunkel-Schetter, Christine, Garite, Thomas J.·1993·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The aim was to test a model of the influence of maternal prenatal psychosocial stress on birth outcomes after controlling for biomedical risk.Study design In a prospective study a sociodemographically homogeneous sample of 90 women was assessed during the third trimester with standard, reliable questionnaires that measured episodic and chronic stress, strain (response to stress), and pregnancy-related anxiety. Birth outcomes included infant birth weight, gestational age at birth, and intrapartum complications. Parity and biomedical (antepartum) risk was also coded. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed after controlling for the effects of biomedical risk factors.Results Independent of biomedical risk, each unit increase of prenatal life event stress (from a possible sample range of 14.7 units) was associated with a 55.03 gm decrease in infant birth weight and with a significant increase in the likelihood of low birth weight (odds ratio 1.32), and each unit increase of prenatal pregnancy anxiety (from a possible sample range of 5 units) was associated with a 3-day decrease in gestational age at birth.Conclusion Independent of biomedical risk, maternal prenatal stress factors are significantly associated with infant birth weight and with gestational age at birth.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90016-c

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 794

Authors
Wadhwa, P. D., Sandman, C. A., Porto, M., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Garite, T. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Wadhwa, Pathik D.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-10
Volume
169
Issue
4
Pages
858-865
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151730966
Cited by
794
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 33
FWCI
7.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD028413, HD 28413-01A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
prenatal stress, maternal psychosocial stress, birth weight, low birth weight, gestational age at delivery, pregnancy-related anxiety, life events, stress response, labor complications, biomedical risk factors, parity
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Apgar Score, Birth Weight, Female, Gestational Age, Humans, Life Change Events, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review